Literature DB >> 21963026

Computerized portion-size estimation compared to multiple 24-hour dietary recalls for measurement of fat, fruit, and vegetable intake in overweight adults.

Deborah J Toobert1, Lisa A Strycker, Sarah E Hampson, Erika Westling, Steven M Christiansen, Thomas G Hurley, James R Hébert.   

Abstract

Validated self-report methods of dietary assessment exist and might be improved in terms of both accuracy and cost-efficiency with computer technology. The objectives of this preliminary study were to develop an initial version of an interactive CD-ROM program to estimate fruit, vegetable, and fat intake, and to compare it to multiple 24-hour dietary recalls (averaged over 3 days). In 2009, overweight male and female adults (n=205) from Lane County, OR, completed computerized and paper versions of fruit, vegetable, and fat screening instruments, and multiple 24-hour dietary recalls. Summary scores from the 10-item National Cancer Institute Fruit and Vegetable Scan and the 18-item Block Fat Screener were compared to multiple 24-hour dietary recall-derived fruit/vegetable and fat intake estimates (criterion measures). Measurement models were used to derive deattenuated correlations with multiple 24-hour dietary recalls of paper and CD-ROM administrations of Fruit and Vegetable Scan fruit intake, vegetable intake, and fruit and vegetable intake, and Block Fat Screener fat intake. The computerized assessment and paper surveys were related to multiple 24-hour dietary recall-derived fruit/vegetable and fat intake. Deattenuated correlation coefficients ranged from 0.50 to 0.73 (all P≤0.0001). The CD-ROM-derived estimate of fruit intake was more closely associated with 24-hour dietary recall (r=0.73) than the paper-derived estimate (r=0.54; P<0.05), but the other comparisons did not differ significantly. Findings from this preliminary study with overweight adults indicate the need for additional enhancements to the CD-ROM assessment and more extensive validation studies.
Copyright © 2011 American Dietetic Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21963026      PMCID: PMC3190578          DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  54 in total

1.  Validation of two-dimensional models for estimation of portion size in nutrition research.

Authors:  B M Posner; C Smigelski; A Duggal; J L Morgan; J Cobb; L A Cupples
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1992-06

2.  Comparison of a food frequency questionnaire using reported vs standard portion sizes for classifying individuals according to nutrient intake.

Authors:  J A Clapp; R S McPherson; D B Reed; B P Hsi
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1991-03

3.  Brief assessments of dietary behavior in field settings.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; J D Perry; D J Toobert; J F Hollis
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  Validity of reported energy intake in obese and nonobese adolescents.

Authors:  L G Bandini; D A Schoeller; H N Cyr; W H Dietz
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Improving food frequency questionnaires: a qualitative approach using cognitive interviewing.

Authors:  A F Subar; F E Thompson; A F Smith; J B Jobe; R G Ziegler; N Potischman; A Schatzkin; A Hartman; C Swanson; L Kruse
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1995-07

6.  Food photography. I: The perception of food portion size from photographs.

Authors:  M Nelson; M Atkinson; S Darbyshire
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Validity and reliability of reported dietary intake data.

Authors:  P M Howat; R Mohan; C Champagne; C Monlezun; P Wozniak; G A Bray
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1994-02

Review 8.  Future of dietary exposure assessment.

Authors:  L Kohlmeier
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Accuracy of estimating food intake by observation.

Authors:  J Gittelsohn; A V Shankar; R P Pokhrel; K P West
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1994-11

Review 10.  Dietary assessment resource manual.

Authors:  F E Thompson; T Byers
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.798

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Considering the value of dietary assessment data in informing nutrition-related health policy.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Thomas G Hurley; Susan E Steck; Donald R Miller; Fred K Tabung; Karen E Peterson; Lawrence H Kushi; Edward A Frongillo
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Low-n-6 and low-n-6 plus high-n-3 diets for use in clinical research.

Authors:  Beth A MacIntosh; Christopher E Ramsden; Keturah R Faurot; Daisy Zamora; Margaret Mangan; Joseph R Hibbeln; J Douglas Mann
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.718

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.