Literature DB >> 7823081

Independent control of limb position and contact forces in cat posture.

F Lacquaniti1, C Maioli.   

Abstract

1. It has previously been demonstrated that a set of geometric and kinetic parameters are invariant in cats standing at their preferred interfoot distance and weight distribution. Thus the length and the angle of orientation relative to the vertical of each limb axis remain approximately constant when the supporting platform is tilted in the sagittal plane. The direction of the tangential contact forces is similarly constrained in response to horizontal translations. The main aim of the present study is to assess whether or not the control of limb position is independent of the control of the contact forces at the feet. To this end we have examined cat posture under a number of different conditions expressly designed to increase the range of postural variability. We considered that if the specification of limb position is a mere byproduct of the neural control of contact forces (or vice versa), geometric and kinetic parameters would covary interdependently. If instead limb position and contact forces are controlled in parallel and independently of each other, they will tend to follow different laws of variation. 2. Limb position and contact forces were measured in intact cats standing freely on a support platform. In a first series of experiments the pitch angle of the platform was randomly changed, as were the interfoot distance and head orientation. In another series of experiments cats were tilted in the presence of an external load tending to shift the weight distribution. The same load was applied in two different manners: 1) it made contact with a very limited surface of the body, and 2) it was attached by means of a long vest that made contact with most of the trunk and produced abnormal somesthesic cues to the body. 3. The range of different experimental conditions resulted in substantial trial-to-trial variations of the length and orientation of the axis of the limbs, as well as variations of the magnitude and orientation of the net contact forces. We found that the changes of the orientation of the contact force vector are uncorrelated with the corresponding changes of limb orientation, thus providing a first line of evidence in favor of the existence of a separate neural control of geometric and kinetic parameters. 4. Another line of evidence is provided by the specific form of the laws of variation of geometric parameters and tangential forces in different animals. Under normal (unloaded) conditions the values of the limb joint angles tend to covary linearly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7823081     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1994.72.4.1476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  19 in total

1.  Differences in preferred reference frames for postural orientation shown by after-effects of stance on an inclined surface.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Fay B Horak; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adaptation of postural orientation to changes in surface inclination.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Robert J Peterka; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural control of motion-to-force transitions with the fingertip.

Authors:  Madhusudhan Venkadesan; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Motor strategies used by rats spinalized at birth to maintain stance in response to imposed perturbations.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter; Michelle R Davies; Virginia Graziani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The effects of foot position and orientation on inter- and intra-foot coordination in standing postures: a frequency domain PCA analysis.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Peter C M Molenaar; Peter M C Molenaar; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Anticipatory control of motion-to-force transitions with the fingertips adapts optimally to task difficulty.

Authors:  Flor A Cianchetti; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements.

Authors:  M Desmurget; C Prablanc; M Arzi; Y Rossetti; Y Paulignan; C Urquizar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Kinematic determinants of human locomotion.

Authors:  N A Borghese; L Bianchi; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Resolving kinematic redundancy in target-reaching movements with and without external constraint.

Authors:  Dongpyo Lee; Daniel M Corcos; Jonathan Shemmell; Sue Leurgans; Ziaul Hasan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Coordinate dependence of variability analysis.

Authors:  Dagmar Sternad; Se-Woong Park; Hermann Müller; Neville Hogan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.