Literature DB >> 19889857

Anticipatory control of motion-to-force transitions with the fingertips adapts optimally to task difficulty.

Flor A Cianchetti1, Francisco J Valero-Cuevas.   

Abstract

Moving our fingertips toward objects to produce well-directed forces immediately upon contact is fundamental to dexterous manipulation. This apparently simple motion-to-force transition in fact involves a time-critical, predictive switch in control strategy. Given that dexterous manipulation must accommodate multiple mechanical conditions, we investigated whether and how this transition adapts to task difficulty. Eight adults (19-39 yr) produced ramps of isometric vertical fingertip force against a rigid surface immediately following a tapping motion. By changing target surface friction and size, we defined an easier (sandpaper, 11 mm diam) versus a more difficult (polished steel, 5 mm diam) task. As in prior work, we assembled fine-wire electromyograms from all seven muscles of the index finger into a seven-dimensional vector defining the full muscle coordination pattern-and quantified its temporal evolution as its alignment with a reference coordination pattern vector for steady-state force production. As predicted by numerical optimizations to neuromuscular delays, our empirical and sigmoidal nonlinear regression analyses show that the coordination pattern transitions begin sooner for the more difficult tasks than for the easier tasks ( approximately 120 ms, P < 0.02, and approximately 115 ms, P < 0.015, respectively) and that the coordination pattern transition in alignment is well represented by a sigmoidal trend (R;2 > 0.7 in most cases). Importantly, the force vector following contact had smaller directional error (P < 0.02) for the more difficult task even though the transition in coordination pattern was less stereotypical and uniform than for the easier task. These adaptations of transition strategy to task difficulty are compatible with an optimization to counteract neuromuscular delays and noise to enable this fundamental element of dexterous manipulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19889857      PMCID: PMC2807214          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00233.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  24 in total

1.  Random change in cortical load representation suggests distinct control of posture and movement.

Authors:  Isaac Kurtzer; Troy M Herter; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-13       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Manipulating the edge of instability.

Authors:  Madhusudhan Venkadesan; John Guckenheimer; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Structured variability of muscle activations supports the minimal intervention principle of motor control.

Authors:  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; Madhusudhan Venkadesan; Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Large index-fingertip forces are produced by subject-independent patterns of muscle excitation.

Authors:  F J Valero-Cuevas; F E Zajac; C G Burgar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; C Maioli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Grip force adjustments evoked by load force perturbations of a grasped object.

Authors:  K J Cole; J H Abbs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Independent control of limb position and contact forces in cat posture.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; C Maioli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects.

Authors:  A M Gordon; G Westling; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Development of human precision grip. V. anticipatory and triggered grip actions during sudden loading.

Authors:  A C Eliasson; H Forssberg; K Ikuta; I Apel; G Westling; R Johansson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of neuromuscular lags on controlling contact transitions.

Authors:  Madhusudhan Venkadesan; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  3 in total

1.  Compensatory motor control after stroke: an alternative joint strategy for object-dependent shaping of hand posture.

Authors:  Preeti Raghavan; Marco Santello; Andrew M Gordon; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Force fluctuations while pressing and moving against high- and low-friction touch screen surfaces.

Authors:  Mukta N Joshi; Kevin G Keenan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Feasibility Theory Reconciles and Informs Alternative Approaches to Neuromuscular Control.

Authors:  Brian A Cohn; May Szedlák; Bernd Gärtner; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.380

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.