Literature DB >> 7811016

Effects of teicoplanin and those of vancomycin in initial empirical antibiotic regimen for febrile, neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies. Gimema Infection Program.

F Menichetti1, P Martino, G Bucaneve, G Gentile, D D'Antonio, V Liso, P Ricci, A M Nosari, M Buelli, M Carotenuto.   

Abstract

The efficacy and toxicity of teicoplanin and vancomycin in the initial empirical antibiotic regimen in febrile, neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies were compared in a prospective, randomized, unblinded, multicenter trial in the setting of 29 hematologic units in tertiary-care or university hospitals. A total of 635 consecutive febrile patients with hematologic malignancies and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia were randomly assigned to receive intravenously amikacin plus ceftazidime plus either teicoplanin at 6 mg/kg of body weight once daily or vancomycin at 1 g twice daily. An efficacy analysis was done for 527 evaluable patients: 275 treated with teicoplanin and 252 treated with vancomycin. Overall, successful outcomes were recorded for 78% of patients who received teicoplanin and 75% of those who were randomized to vancomycin (difference, 3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10 to 4%; P = 0.33). A total of 102 patients presented with primary, single-agent, gram-positive bacteremia. Coagulase-negative staphylococci accounted for 42%, Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 27%, and streptococci accounted for 21% of all gram-positive blood isolates. The overall responses to therapy of gram-positive bacteremias were 92 and 87% for teicoplanin and vancomycin, respectively (difference, 5%; CI, -17 to 6%; P = 0.22). Side effects, mainly represented by skin rash, occurred in 3.2 and 8% of teicoplanin- and vancomycin-treated patients, respectively (difference, -4.8%; CI, 0.7 to 8%; P = 0.03); the rate of nephrotoxicity was 1.4 and 0.8% for the teicoplanin and vancomycin groups, respectively (difference, 0.6%; CI, -2 to 1%; P = 0.68). Further infections were caused by gram-positive organisms in two patients (0.7%) treated with teicoplanin and one patient (0.4%) who received vancomycin (difference, 0.3%; CI, -0.9 to 1.0%; P = 0.53). Overall mortalities were 8.5 and 11% for teicoplanin- and vancomycin-treated patients, respectively (difference, -2.5%; CI, - 2 to 7%; P = 0.43); death was caused by primary gram-positive infections in three patients (1%) in each treatment group. When used for initial empirical antibiotic therapy in febrile, neutropenic patients, teicoplanin was at least as efficacious as vancomycin, but it was associated with fewer side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7811016      PMCID: PMC284681          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.38.9.2041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  19 in total

1.  Failure of teicoplanin therapy in two neutropenic patients with staphylococcal septicemia who recovered after administration of vancomycin.

Authors:  F Brunet; G Vedel; F Dreyfus; J F Vaxelaire; T Giraud; B Schremmer; J F Monsallier
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Poor efficacy of teicoplanin in treatment of deep-seated staphylococcal infections.

Authors:  N Galanakis; H Giamarellou; N Vlachogiannis; C Dendrinos; G K Daikos
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Teicoplanin in empirical combined antibiotic therapy of bacteraemias in bone marrow transplant patients.

Authors:  F Menichetti; A Del Favero; G Bucaneve; F Aversa; F Baldelli; R Felicini; A Terenzi; S Pauluzzi
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Vancomycin, ticarcillin, and amikacin compared with ticarcillin-clavulanate and amikacin in the empirical treatment of febrile, neutropenic children with cancer.

Authors:  J L Shenep; W T Hughes; P K Roberson; K R Blankenship; D K Baker; W H Meyer; F Gigliotti; J W Sixbey; V M Santana; S Feldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Empiric use of vancomycin during prolonged treatment-induced granulocytopenia. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with acute leukemia.

Authors:  J E Karp; J D Dick; C Angelopulos; P Charache; L Green; P J Burke; R Saral
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Piperacillin plus amikacin vs. piperacillin plus amikacin plus teicoplanin for empirical treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients receiving quinolone prophylaxis.

Authors:  P Martino; A Micozzi; G Gentile; R Raccah; C Girmenia; F Mandelli
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Empiric antimicrobial therapy in febrile granulocytopenic patients. Randomized prospective comparison of amikacin plus piperacillin with or without parenteral trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole.

Authors:  F Menichetti; A Del Favero; R Guerciolini; M Tonato; F Aversa; F Roila; R F Frongillo; M F Martelli; S Davis; S Pauluzzi
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Prospective randomized clinical trial of teicoplanin for empiric combined antibiotic therapy in febrile, granulocytopenic acute leukemia patients.

Authors:  A Del Favero; F Menichetti; R Guerciolini; G Bucaneve; F Baldelli; F Aversa; A Terenzi; S Davis; S Pauluzzi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Early termination of a prospective, randomized trial comparing teicoplanin and flucloxacillin for treating severe staphylococcal infections.

Authors:  P Calain; K H Krause; P Vaudaux; R Auckenthaler; D Lew; F Waldvogel; B Hirschel
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  16 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of vancomycin for the treatment of patients with gram-positive infections: focus on the study design.

Authors:  Konstantinos Z Vardakas; Michael N Mavros; Nikolaos Roussos; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  A survey of the use of teicoplanin in patients with haematological malignancies and solid tumours.

Authors:  J M Davies
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 3.  Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a review.

Authors:  Thomas L Holland; Christopher Arnold; Vance G Fowler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Population pharmacokinetic study of teicoplanin in severely neutropenic patients.

Authors:  O Lortholary; M Tod; N Rizzo; C Padoin; O Biard; P Casassus; L Guillevin; O Petitjean
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Top Guns: The "Maverick" and "Goose" of Empiric Therapy.

Authors:  Stephen W Davies; Jimmy T Efird; Christopher A Guidry; Zachary C Dietch; Rhett N Willis; Puja M Shah; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.150

Review 6.  Teicoplanin. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of gram-positive infections.

Authors:  C M Spencer; H M Bryson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  A risk-benefit assessment of teicoplanin in the treatment of infections.

Authors:  F de Lalla; A Tramarin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimization of teicoplanin in children with malignant haematological disease.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Daolun Zhang; Thomas Storme; André Baruchel; Xavier Declèves; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Vancomycin and nephrotoxicity: just another myth?

Authors:  Stephen W Davies; Christopher A Guidry; Robin T Petroze; Tjasa Hranjec; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.313

10.  Implementation and evaluation of a stochastic control strategy for individualizing teicoplanin dosage regimen.

Authors:  M Tod; P Alet; O Lortholary; O Petitjean
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1997-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.