Literature DB >> 2959198

Prospective randomized clinical trial of teicoplanin for empiric combined antibiotic therapy in febrile, granulocytopenic acute leukemia patients.

A Del Favero1, F Menichetti, R Guerciolini, G Bucaneve, F Baldelli, F Aversa, A Terenzi, S Davis, S Pauluzzi.   

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of bacteremia caused by gram-positive bacteria in granulocytopenic acute leukemia patients prompted us to evaluate, in a prospective randomized trial, the role of teicoplanin, a new glycopeptide antibiotic, when it was added to amikacin plus ceftazidime, as an empiric therapy of fever in these patients. Of 47 evaluable episodes, 22 were treated with the teicoplanin regimen and 25 were treated with the combination of amikacin and ceftazidime. The overall response to therapy of patients treated with teicoplanin was slightly better (82% improvement) than that obtained with amikacin plus ceftazidime (52%). The response rate of patients with gram-positive bacteremias was 80% (4 of 5) to the regimen that included teicoplanin; 25% (1 of 4) of the patients treated with amikacin plus ceftazidime responded to treatment; and for patients with gram-negative bacteremias, the response rates were, respectively, 100% (4 of 4) and 70% (7 of 10). The better results obtained with amikacin-ceftazidime-teicoplanin treatment were most evident in patients with profound (less than 100/mm3) and persistent neutropenia (83 versus 30% improvement). Furthermore, a good response rate of patients with gram-positive bacteremias (seven of eight; 87% improvement) was achieved in a small group of bone marrow transplant patients who were all treated with amikacin-ceftazidime-teicoplanin. No severe side effects were documented in any patient. Teicoplanin, as a drug administered as a single daily dose, seems to be a safe and useful anti-gram-positive agent when used in combination with amikacin-ceftazidime as an empiric therapy of febrile episodes in granulocytopenic acute leukemia patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2959198      PMCID: PMC174882          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.31.7.1126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  11 in total

Review 1.  Infection in bone marrow transplant recipients.

Authors:  J D Meyers
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-07-28       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Empirical antimicrobial therapy in the neutropenic host.

Authors:  L S Young
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Structure and mechanism of action of teicoplanin.

Authors:  F Parenti
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Fever in the pediatric and young adult patient with cancer. A prospective study of 1001 episodes.

Authors:  P A Pizzo; K J Robichaud; R Wesley; J R Commers
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Infection in cancer patients. A continuing association.

Authors:  G P Bodey
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-07-28       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Empiric use of vancomycin during prolonged treatment-induced granulocytopenia. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with acute leukemia.

Authors:  J E Karp; J D Dick; C Angelopulos; P Charache; L Green; P J Burke; R Saral
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 7.  Concept of empiric therapy with antibiotic combinations. Indications and limits.

Authors:  J Klastersky
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-05-30       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Empiric antimicrobial therapy in febrile granulocytopenic patients. Randomized prospective comparison of amikacin plus piperacillin with or without parenteral trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole.

Authors:  F Menichetti; A Del Favero; R Guerciolini; M Tonato; F Aversa; F Roila; R F Frongillo; M F Martelli; S Davis; S Pauluzzi
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  In vitro activity of teichomycin A 2 in comparison with penicillin and vancomycin against gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  A Bauernfeind; C Petermüller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Piperacillin or ticarcillin plus amikacin. A double-blind prospective comparison of empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients.

Authors:  J C Wade; S C Schimpff; K A Newman; C L Fortner; H C Standiford; P H Wiernik
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the use of teicoplanin in patients with haematological malignancies and solid tumours.

Authors:  J M Davies
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Evaluation of a novel fluorescence polarization immunoassay for teicoplanin.

Authors:  H Cox; M Whitby; G Nimmo; G Williams
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  A risk-benefit assessment of teicoplanin in the treatment of infections.

Authors:  F de Lalla; A Tramarin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Cost analysis of 2 empiric antibacterial regimens containing glycopeptides for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with acute leukaemia.

Authors:  G Bucaneve; F Menichetti; A Del Favero
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Teicoplanin plus ciprofloxacin versus gentamicin plus piperacillin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.

Authors:  S M Kelsey; B Weinhardt; P W Collins; A C Newland
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Patterns of infection in 41 patients with idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis.

Authors:  D D'Antonio; A Iacone; G Fioritoni; P Di Bartolomeo; G Torlontano
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.673

7.  Effects of teicoplanin and those of vancomycin in initial empirical antibiotic regimen for febrile, neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies. Gimema Infection Program.

Authors:  F Menichetti; P Martino; G Bucaneve; G Gentile; D D'Antonio; V Liso; P Ricci; A M Nosari; M Buelli; M Carotenuto
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Vancomycin is not an essential component of the initial empiric treatment regimen for febrile neutropenic patients receiving ceftazidime: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  R Ramphal; M Bolger; D J Oblon; R J Sherertz; J D Malone; K H Rand; M Gilliom; J W Shands; B S Kramer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Teicoplanin alone or combined with rifampin compared with vancomycin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H J Schaad; C Chuard; P Vaudaux; F A Waldvogel; D P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Failure of treatment with teicoplanin at 6 milligrams/kilogram/day in patients with Staphylococcus aureus intravascular infection. The Infectious Diseases Consortium of Oregon.

Authors:  D N Gilbert; C A Wood; R C Kimbrough
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.