Literature DB >> 7807109

Fractures of the ipsilateral femur after hip arthroplasty. A statistical analysis of outcome based on 487 patients.

M A Mont1, D C Maar.   

Abstract

A complete review of the literature revealed 487 patients in 26 published reports with ipsilateral femur fractures occurring about the femoral prosthetic stem. This review included general surveys, multicenter studies, and case reports. Based on these studies, the authors divided the fractures into six types: type 1, intertrochanteric; type 2, proximal femur; type 3, spanning the prosthesis tip; type 4, distal to the prosthesis tip; type 5, comminuted blowout; and type 6, supracondylar. Type 1-5 fractures were stratified into the following treatment groups: traction, casting and partial weight bearing, cerclage wiring, screw/plate fixation, long-stem revision with plus/minus supplementation fixation or bone-graft, and other less frequently reported techniques. A statistical analysis of each type of fracture in terms of the various treatments used and the clinical outcome was performed. The best results based on the literature would be cerclage wiring or long-stem revision for types 2, 3, and 5 fractures (P < .02). For type 4 fractures, traction and long-stem revisions were about equally successful (at 77 and 74%, respectively), and were both superior to screw/plate fixation or cerclage fixation (P < .01). Other factors, such as cemented versus cementless prostheses, stable versus unstable prostheses, overall medical condition of the patient, and other parameters, should be analyzed and considered when choosing a treatment course. Based on the authors' results, suggestions for the treatment of each fracture type are offered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7807109     DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90098-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  27 in total

1.  Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using a modular cementless stem without allografting.

Authors:  Daniel Neumann; Christoph Thaler; Ulrich Dorn
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip replacement treated with polyaxial locking plate.

Authors:  M F Hoffmann; S Lotzien; T A Schildhauer
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-06

3.  [Intramedullary nailing of periprosthetic femoral fractures after revision for total knee endoprosthesis. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures by inserted knee endoprostheis with intramedullary shaft by in situ lengthening of the prosthesis with specially prepared slotted hollow nails].

Authors:  C Meyer; V Alt; C Heiss; R Kraus; G Szalay; R Schnettler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Periprosthetic fractures around cementless hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems.

Authors:  B C H van der Wal; M Vischjager; B Grimm; I C Heyligers; A J Tonino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Management of Vancouver type B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using an uncemented extensively porous-coated long femoral stem prosthesis.

Authors:  Kerem Canbora; Ozkan Kose; Atilla Polat; Faruk Aykanat; Mucahit Gorgec
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-06-14

6.  [Periprosthetic fractures. Long-term results after plate osteosynthesis stabilization].

Authors:  M Rupprecht; L Grossterlinden; F Barvencik; M Gebauer; D Briem; J M Rueger; W Lehmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures--incidence, classification problems and the proposal of a modified classification scheme.

Authors:  Stephan Frenzel; Vilmos Vécsei; Lukas Negrin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [The prosthesis nail -- a new stable fixation device for periprosthetic fractures and critical fractures of the proximal femur].

Authors:  A Probst; T Schneider; S Hankemeier; E Brug
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 9.  [Periprosthetic fractures: classification, management, therapy].

Authors:  A Gruner; T Hockertz; H Reilmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases.

Authors:  Toby W Briant-Evans; Darmaraja Veeramootoo; Eleftherios Tsiridis; Matthew J Hubble
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.