Literature DB >> 15928913

Periprosthetic fractures around cementless hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems.

B C H van der Wal1, M Vischjager, B Grimm, I C Heyligers, A J Tonino.   

Abstract

We studied 14 periprosthetic femoral fractures out of a series of 619 hydroxyapatite coated hip implants and compared the outcome to published treatment algorithms using the Vancouver classification. There were five type A fractures, six B1, two B2, and one type B3 fracture. All but one type A fractures were treated conservatively. Compared with the Vancouver classification, we observed a different fracture type in the type B fractures. No fractures at the tip of the stem were seen, as in cemented implants. Three B1 fractures were treated operatively due to fracture displacement, and three were treated conservatively. The B2 and B3 fractures were managed with long, uncemented, revision stems because of a disrupted bone-prosthesis interface. All fractures healed well. This study confirms that the modified algorithm of management of periprosthetic fractures, using the Vancouver classification, is a simple, reproducible, classification system for uncemented prostheses. Conservative treatment is a valid option if the implant is stable whilst surgical intervention is mandatory if the implant is loose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15928913      PMCID: PMC3474523          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-005-0657-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  21 in total

1.  Dall-Miles plating for periprosthetic B1 fractures of the femur.

Authors:  T S Tadross; A M Nanu; M J Buchanan; R G Checketts
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss.

Authors:  A I A Rahmy; T Gosens; G M Blake; A Tonino; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  The management of periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem.

Authors:  I D Learmonth
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-01

4.  The hydroxyapatite-ABG hip system: 5- to 7-year results from an international multicentre study. The International ABG Study Group.

Authors:  A J Tonino; A I Rahmy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Fractures of the femur in relation to cemented hip prostheses.

Authors:  P H Cooke; J H Newman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1988-05

Review 6.  Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment.

Authors:  Bassam A Masri; R M Dominic Meek; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Fracture of the ipsilateral femur in patients wih total hip replacement.

Authors:  J E Johansson; R McBroom; T W Barrington; G A Hunter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  High survival rate of hydroxyapatite-coated hip prostheses: 100 consecutive hips followed for 10 years.

Authors:  Cornelis J M Oosterbos; Ali I A Rahmy; Alphons J Tonino; Wendy Witpeerd
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-04

Review 9.  A prospective, modernized treatment protocol for periprosthetic femur fractures.

Authors:  Paul J Duwelius; Andrew H Schmidt; Richard F Kyle; Vanessa Talbott; Thomas J Ellis; Jay B V Butler
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Stress fracture as a cause of chronic pain following revision total hip arthroplasty. Report of two cases.

Authors:  P A Lotke; R Y Wong; M L Ecker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  8 in total

1.  Preoperative bone quality as a factor in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis comparing bone remodelling between two implant types.

Authors:  Bart Cornelis Hendrikus van der Wal; Ali Rahmy; Bernd Grimm; Ide Heyligers; Alphons Tonino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-11-04       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Luca Cavagnaro; Matteo Formica; Marco Basso; Andrea Zanirato; Stefano Divano; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-07-01

3.  Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation and re-operation when used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Anne S Bensen; Thomas Jakobsen; Niels Krarup
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Management of late periprosthetic femur fractures: a retrospective cohort of 72 patients.

Authors:  Cibu Mukundan; Faizal Rayan; Ehab Kheir; D Macdonald
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Periprosthetic Vancouver type B1 and C fractures treated by locking-plate osteosynthesis: fracture union and reoperations in 60 consecutive fractures.

Authors:  Lonnie Froberg; Anders Troelsen; Michael Brix
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Poor intermediate-term survival of the uncemented Optan anatomically adapted femoral component.

Authors:  Luc J M Heijnens; Jelle J Halma; Steven M van Gaalen; Arthur de Gast
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Short stems have lower load at failure than double-wedged stems in a cadaveric cementless fracture model.

Authors:  Antonio Klasan; Martin Bäumlein; Philipp Dworschak; Christopher Bliemel; Thomas Neri; Markus D Schofer; Thomas J Heyse
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 8.  Periprosthetic fracture as a late mode of failure of the Anatomique Benoist Girard II femoral prosthesis.

Authors:  Jonathan S Mulford; Ronnie Mathew; David Penn; Alana R Cuthbert; Richard De Steiger
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.025

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.