Literature DB >> 7789362

Biological basis of germline mutation: comparisons of spontaneous germline mutation rates among drosophila, mouse, and human.

J B Drost1, W R Lee.   

Abstract

Spontaneous mutation rates per generation are similar among the three species considered here--Drosophila, mouse, and human--and are not related to time, as is often assumed. Spontaneous germline mutation rates per generation averaged among loci are less variable among species than they are among loci and tests and between gender. Mutation rates are highly variable over time in diverse lineages. Recent estimates of the number of germ cell divisions per generation are: for humans, 401 (30-year generation) in males and 31 in females; for mice, 62 (9-month generation) in males and 25 in females; and for Drosophila melanogaster, 35.5 (18-day generation) in males and 36.5 (25-day generation) in females. The relationships between germ cell division estimates of the two sexes in the three species closely reflect those between mutation rates in the sexes, although mutation rates per cell division vary among species. Whereas the overall rate per generation is constant among species, this consistency must be achieved by diverse mechanisms. Modifiers of mutation rates, on which selection might act, include germline characteristics that contribute disproportionately to the total mutation rates. The germline mutation rates between the sexes within a species are largely influenced by germ cell divisions per generation. Also, a large portion of the total mutations occur during the interval between the beginning of meiosis and differentiation of the soma from the germline. Significant genetic events contributing to mutations during this time may include meiosis, lack of DNA repair in sperm cells, methylation of CpG dinucleotides in mammalian sperm and early embryo, gonomeric fertilization, and rapid cleavage divisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7789362     DOI: 10.1002/em.2850250609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  91 in total

Review 1.  Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Phylogenomic analysis of the uracil-DNA glycosylase superfamily.

Authors:  J Ignacio Lucas-Lledó; Rohan Maddamsetti; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Double trans-chromosomic mice: maintenance of two individual human chromosome fragments containing Ig heavy and kappa loci and expression of fully human antibodies.

Authors:  K Tomizuka; T Shinohara; H Yoshida; H Uejima; A Ohguma; S Tanaka; K Sato; M Oshimura; I Ishida
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Genome analyses substantiate male mutation bias in many species.

Authors:  Melissa A Wilson Sayres; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  Pronounced maternal parent-of-origin bias for type-1 NF1 microdeletions.

Authors:  Lisa Neuhäusler; Anna Summerer; David N Cooper; Victor-F Mautner; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  High male:female ratio of germ-line mutations: an alternative explanation for postulated gestational lethality in males in X-linked dominant disorders.

Authors:  G H Thomas
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Spontaneous mutations in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae: more beneficial than expected.

Authors:  Sarah B Joseph; David W Hall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Reproductive Longevity Predicts Mutation Rates in Primates.

Authors:  Gregg W C Thomas; Richard J Wang; Arthi Puri; R Alan Harris; Muthuswamy Raveendran; Daniel S T Hughes; Shwetha C Murali; Lawrence E Williams; Harsha Doddapaneni; Donna M Muzny; Richard A Gibbs; Christian R Abee; Mary R Galinski; Kim C Worley; Jeffrey Rogers; Predrag Radivojac; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  Somatic mosaicism: implications for disease and transmission genetics.

Authors:  Ian M Campbell; Chad A Shaw; Pawel Stankiewicz; James R Lupski
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.