Literature DB >> 7786943

Cervical screening in general practice.

D A Pritchard1, J A Straton, J Hyndman.   

Abstract

This study examined the effect of three interventions for encouraging women to have a Pap smear in a general practice: tagging the medical record to remind the doctor to offer a Pap smear, sending an invitation to make an appointment for a Pap smear, and sending an invitation with an appointment to attend for a Pap smear at a special screening clinic staffed by women. The study took place in a university general practice at Lockridge, near Perth. A computerised practice age-sex register provided 2139 women in the age range 36 to 69 inclusive. Of these, 757 were eligible for inclusion in the study and were allocated randomly to one of three intervention groups or a control group. In total, 177 women had a Pap smear during the study. Significantly more Pap smears were taken for the appointment-letter and letter-only groups than the control group (odds ratio (OR) 2.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34 to 3.57, and OR 1.67, CI 1.01 to 2.77 respectively), but there was no significant difference between the tagged-notes and the control groups. Women who attended the screening clinic rated the experience positively. Attendance, however, was inadequate for the clinic's viability in a private practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7786943     DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00368.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Public Health        ISSN: 1035-7319


  13 in total

Review 1.  Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Thomas R Talbot; David L Sanders; S Trent Rosenbloom; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Jane Zapka; Heather Edwards; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

3.  Efficacy of patient letter reminders on cervical cancer screening: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  D S Tseng; E Cox; M B Plane; K M Hla
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Recruitment of women by GPs for pap tests: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J E Pirkis; D Jolley; D R Dunt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Thomas Everett; Andrew Bryant; Michelle F Griffin; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Carol A Forbes; Ruth G Jepson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11

6.  Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Tomas Pantoja; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Nathalie Colomer; Carla Castañon; Javiera Leniz Martelli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-18

Review 7.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Helen Staley; Aslam Shiraz; Norman Shreeve; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Ketankumar Gajjar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-06

8.  Randomised trial investigating the relationship of response rate for blood sample donation to site of biospecimen collection, fasting status and reminder letter: the 45 and Up Study.

Authors:  Emily Banks; Nicol Herbert; Kris Rogers; Tanya Mather; Louisa Jorm
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura Camilloni; Eliana Ferroni; Beatriz Jimenez Cendales; Annamaria Pezzarossi; Giacomo Furnari; Piero Borgia; Gabriella Guasticchi; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The costs of offering HPV-testing on self-taken samples to non-attendees of cervical screening in Finland.

Authors:  Anni Virtanen; Ahti Anttila; Pekka Nieminen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.