Literature DB >> 18308989

Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Judith W Dexheimer1, Thomas R Talbot, David L Sanders, S Trent Rosenbloom, Dominik Aronsky.   

Abstract

Preventive care measures remain underutilized despite recommendations to increase their use. The objective of this review was to examine the characteristics, types, and effects of paper- and computer-based interventions for preventive care measures. The study provides an update to a previous systematic review. We included randomized controlled trials that implemented a physician reminder and measured the effects on the frequency of providing preventive care. Of the 1,535 articles identified, 28 met inclusion criteria and were combined with the 33 studies from the previous review. The studies involved 264 preventive care interventions, 4,638 clinicians and 144,605 patients. Implementation strategies included combined paper-based with computer generated reminders in 34 studies (56%), paper-based reminders in 19 studies (31%), and fully computerized reminders in 8 studies (13%). The average increase for the three strategies in delivering preventive care measures ranged between 12% and 14%. Cardiac care and smoking cessation reminders were most effective. Computer-generated prompts were the most commonly implemented reminders. Clinician reminders are a successful approach for increasing the rates of delivering preventive care; however, their effectiveness remains modest. Despite increased implementation of electronic health records, randomized controlled trials evaluating computerized reminder systems are infrequent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18308989      PMCID: PMC2410011          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  79 in total

1.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?

Authors:  Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The effect of adding Pap smear information to a mammography reminder system in an HMO: results of randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert C Burack; Phyllis A Gimotty; Michael Simon; Anita Moncrease; Peter Dews
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  The effect of patient reminders on the use of screening mammography in an urban health department primary care setting.

Authors:  M S Simon; P A Gimotty; A Moncrease; P Dews; R C Burack
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erin G Stone; Sally C Morton; Marlies E Hulscher; Margaret A Maglione; Elizabeth A Roth; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Brian S Mittman; Lisa V Rubenstein; Laurence Z Rubenstein; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients.

Authors:  P R Dexter; S Perkins; J M Overhage; K Maharry; R B Kohler; C J McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Improving attendance for breast screening among recent non-attenders: a randomised controlled trial of two interventions in primary care.

Authors:  C Bankhead; S H Richards; T J Peters; D J Sharp; F D Hobbs; J Brown; L Roberts; C Tydeman; V Redman; J Formby; S Wilson; J Austoker
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  A systematic approach for increasing pneumococcal vaccination rates at an inner-city public hospital.

Authors:  Jennifer D Shevlin; Christopher Summers-Bean; Donna Thomas; Cynthia G Whitney; Daryl Todd; Susan M Ray
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  A randomised, clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of hospital and community-based reminder systems for increasing uptake of influenza and pneumococcal vaccine in hospitalised patients aged 65 years and over.

Authors:  C R MacIntyre; M A Kainer; G V Brown
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.140

9.  Effects of an automated electronic reminder in changing the antiplatelet drug-prescribing behavior among Italian general practitioners in diabetic patients: an intervention trial.

Authors:  Alessandro Filippi; Andrea Sabatini; Letizia Badioli; Fabio Samani; Giampiero Mazzaglia; Alberico Catapano; Claudio Cricelli
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin Eccles; Elaine McColl; Nick Steen; Nikki Rousseau; Jeremy Grimshaw; David Parkin; Ian Purves
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-26
View more
  77 in total

Review 1.  Changing clinical practice through patient specific reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Traversing the many paths of workflow research: developing a conceptual framework of workflow terminology through a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Kim M Unertl; Laurie L Novak; Kevin B Johnson; Nancy M Lorenzi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies.

Authors:  Francis Lau; Craig Kuziemsky; Morgan Price; Jesse Gardner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Primary Care Physician Designation and Response to Clinical Decision Support Reminders: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Weinfeld; Paul N Gorman
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Barriers to implementing evidence-based clinical guidelines: a survey of early adopters.

Authors:  Heiko Spallek; Mei Song; Deborah E Polk; Tanja Bekhuis; Julie Frantsve-Hawley; Krishna Aravamudhan
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.267

6.  The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time.

Authors:  Li Zhou; Christine S Soran; Chelsea A Jenter; Lynn A Volk; E John Orav; David W Bates; Steven R Simon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Quality of health care in the United States: implications for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Brendan M Boyle; Lena Palmer; Michael D Kappelman
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.839

8.  Using electronic health record alerts to provide public health situational awareness to clinicians.

Authors:  Joseph Lurio; Frances P Morrison; Michelle Pichardo; Rachel Berg; Michael D Buck; Winfred Wu; Kwame Kitson; Farzad Mostashari; Neil Calman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Alison Jennings; Alain Mayhew; Craig Ramsay; Martin Eccles; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  The effect of feedback to general practitioners on quality of care for people with type 2 diabetes. A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Trine Lignell Guldberg; Torsten Lauritzen; Jette Kolding Kristensen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.