Literature DB >> 7759719

Referral for coronary artery revascularization procedures after diagnostic coronary angiography: evidence for gender bias?

M R Bell1, P B Berger, D R Holmes, C J Mullany, K R Bailey, B J Gersh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether there is a gender bias in the selection of patients for coronary revascularization once the severity of the underlying coronary artery disease has been established with angiography.
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that women with coronary artery disease are less likely to be referred for coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass surgery than men. Whether such a referral bias for revascularization procedures, including coronary angioplasty, is present once angiography has been performed is not clear.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 22,795 patients with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent coronary angiography between 1981 and 1991 and compared the numbers of women and men who underwent either coronary artery bypass surgery or coronary angioplasty within 30 days of coronary angiography.
RESULTS: Angiography revealed significant (one-vessel or more) disease in 15,455 patients (52% of women, 76% of men). Despite worse symptoms, women had less extensive coronary disease than men as judged by the number of vessels diseased. Women were also more likely to have other co-morbid diseases. An equal proportion of women (54%) and men underwent revascularization procedures. After adjustment for baseline differences and age, differences in the two individual revascularization strategies were very small: More women tended to have coronary angioplasty ([absolute difference +/- 1 SD] + 3.3 +/- 0.7%, p < 0.0001), but fewer had coronary artery bypass surgery than men (-2.5 +/- 0.8%, p = 0.003). When the two revascularization strategies were considered together, there was no significant gender difference in overall adjusted use of revascularization (+ 0.8 +/- 0.9%, p = 0.41).
CONCLUSIONS: Once diagnostic coronary angiography had been performed, no major differences in the overall utilization of revascularization procedures were noted for women compared with men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7759719     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00044-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  14 in total

Review 1.  A two way view of gender bias in medicine.

Authors:  M T Ruiz; L M Verbrugge
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Sex differences in utilization and outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with proximal lower extremity deep venous thrombosis - Insights from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Vladimir Lakhter; Chad J Zack; Yevgeniy Brailovsky; Saurav Chatterjee; Vikas Aggarwal; Koneti A Rao; Deborah Crabbe; Huaqing Zhao; Eric Choi; Raghu Kolluri; Riyaz Bashir
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.239

3.  Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders.

Authors:  Peter Ong; Anastasios Athanasiadis; Udo Sechtem
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies in Microvascular Angina.

Authors:  Bryn Mumma; Nathalie Flacke
Journal:  Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep       Date:  2015-03

5.  Referrals in acute coronary events for CARdiac catheterization: The RACE CAR trial.

Authors:  Catherine Kreatsoulas; Debi Sloane; Janice Pogue; James L Velianou; Sonia S Anand
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 6.  A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Louise Pilote; Kaberi Dasgupta; Veena Guru; Karin H Humphries; Jennifer McGrath; Colleen Norris; Doreen Rabi; Johanne Tremblay; Arsham Alamian; Tracie Barnett; Jafna Cox; William Amin Ghali; Sherry Grace; Pavel Hamet; Teresa Ho; Susan Kirkland; Marie Lambert; Danielle Libersan; Jennifer O'Loughlin; Gilles Paradis; Milan Petrovich; Vicky Tagalakis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Does gender influence emergency department management and outcomes in geriatric abdominal pain?

Authors:  Rebekah L Gardner; Richard Almeida; Judith H Maselli; Andrew Auerbach
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  The importance of study design strategies in gender bias research: the case of respiratory disease management in primary care.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Ruiz-Cantero; Elena Ronda; Carlos Alvarez-Dardet
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Gender differences in the surgical management and early clinical outcome of coronary artery disease: Single centre experience.

Authors:  Munir Ahmad; Ahmed A Arifi; Rawdené van Onselen; Ahmed A Alkodami; Muayed Zaibag; Abdul Aziz A Khaldi; Hani K Najm
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2010-02-24

10.  Association of Sex With Severity of Coronary Artery Disease, Ischemia, and Symptom Burden in Patients With Moderate or Severe Ischemia: Secondary Analysis of the ISCHEMIA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Harmony R Reynolds; Leslee J Shaw; James K Min; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; Daniel S Berman; Michael H Picard; Raymond Y Kwong; C Noel Bairey-Merz; Derek D Cyr; Renato D Lopes; Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon; Claes Held; Hanna Szwed; Roxy Senior; Gilbert Gosselin; Rajesh Gopalan Nair; Ahmed Elghamaz; Olga Bockeria; Jiyan Chen; Alexander M Chernyavskiy; Balram Bhargava; Jonathan D Newman; Sasa B Hinic; Joanna Jaroch; Angela Hoye; Jeffrey Berger; William E Boden; Sean M O'Brien; David J Maron; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.