Literature DB >> 23960594

Gender differences in the surgical management and early clinical outcome of coronary artery disease: Single centre experience.

Munir Ahmad1, Ahmed A Arifi, Rawdené van Onselen, Ahmed A Alkodami, Muayed Zaibag, Abdul Aziz A Khaldi, Hani K Najm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the gender disparity in the distribution of patient-related risk factors and their effect on the surgical management and clinical outcome of coronary artery disease in Saudi population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 971 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at our institution between January 2005 and December 2008. Seven hundred and eighty seven patients (81%) were males and 184 patients (19%) were females. We analyzed gender-based difference in clinical presentation and patient-related pre-operative risk factors and studied their impact on surgical management and clinical outcome.
RESULTS: The mean age was 59.5 years in males and 63.4 years in females (p = <0.0001). Associated co-morbidities were higher in females. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 61.2% in males and 78.8% in females (p-value = <0.0001); hypertension 61.9% in males and 79.9% in females (p-value <0.0001); hyperlipidemia 66.7% in males and 77.7% in females (p-value 0.0035); morbid obesity 24.7% in males and 45.1% in females (p-value <0.0001); and Hypothyroidism 2.5% in males and 13.6% in females (p-value <0.0001). Smoking was the only risk factor with higher prevalence in males compared to females (44.2% v/s 2.2%; p-value <0.0001). The mean logistic euroSCORE was 3.94 in males and 5.51 in females (p < 0.0003). On-pump and off-pump CABG was carried out in equal numbers in two groups. Females required urgent surgery and less than 3 grafts more frequently while males underwent elective surgery and more than 3 grafts in greater numbers. No significant difference was present between the two gender groups in aortic occlusion times and bypass times. Univariant analysis revealed females gender as an independent risk factor for higher in-hospital mortality (1.1% versus 4.9% p = 0.0026) and higher incidence of post-operative complications like surgical wound infection, need for prolonged ventilation, low cardiac output state and multi-organ failure (p-values 0.01 or less).
CONCLUSION: Female gender is an independent predictor of adverse outcome after isolated CABG due to significantly higher co-morbidities and acute presentation and independent of their peri-operative management. Therefore, major socioeconomic education and preventive measures are needed to reduce the burden of major co-morbidities in females and to seek early cardiac advice and care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular risk factors; Coronary artery bypass surgery in females; Gender bias; Gender disparity

Year:  2010        PMID: 23960594      PMCID: PMC3727538          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2010.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc        ISSN: 1016-7315


  36 in total

1.  Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care.

Authors:  K Fiscella; P Franks; M R Gold; C M Clancy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-05-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Outcome and profile of women and men presenting with acute coronary syndromes: a report from TIMI IIIB. TIMI Investigators. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  J S Hochman; C H McCabe; P H Stone; R C Becker; C P Cannon; T DeFeo-Fraulini; B Thompson; R Steingart; G Knatterud; E Braunwald
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators.

Authors:  R M Steingart; M Packer; P Hamm; M E Coglianese; B Gersh; E M Geltman; J Sollano; S Katz; L Moyé; L L Basta
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Selection of patients for coronary angiography and coronary revascularization early after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for a gender bias?

Authors:  H M Krumholz; P S Douglas; M S Lauer; R C Pasternak
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Gender differences in the management and clinical outcome of stable angina.

Authors:  Caroline Daly; Felicity Clemens; Jose L Lopez Sendon; Luigi Tavazzi; Eric Boersma; Nicholas Danchin; Francois Delahaye; Anselm Gitt; Desmond Julian; David Mulcahy; Witold Ruzyllo; Kristian Thygesen; Freek Verheugt; Kim M Fox
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Sex differences in access to coronary revascularization after cardiac catheterization: importance of detailed clinical data.

Authors:  William A Ghali; Peter D Faris; P Diane Galbraith; Colleen M Norris; Michael J Curtis; L Duncan Saunders; Vladimir Dzavik; L Brent Mitchell; Merril L Knudtson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-21       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Coronary artery surgery: are women discriminated against?

Authors:  M Petticrew; M McKee; J Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-01

8.  Socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults.

Authors:  P M Lantz; J S House; J M Lepkowski; D R Williams; R P Mero; J Chen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Are there gender differences related to stress or pharmacological echocardiography?

Authors:  L J Crouse; P H Kramer
Journal:  Am J Card Imaging       Date:  1996-01

10.  Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.

Authors:  Karen P Alexander; L Kristin Newby; Paul W Armstrong; Christopher P Cannon; W Brian Gibler; Michael W Rich; Frans Van de Werf; Harvey D White; W Douglas Weaver; Mary D Naylor; Joel M Gore; Harlan M Krumholz; E Magnus Ohman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  6 in total

1.  Gender differences in cardiovascular risk factors among adolescents in Aseer Region, southwestern Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ahmed A Mahfouz; Abdullah S Shatoor; Mervat A Hassanein; Amani Mohamed; Aesha Farheen
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2011-10-19

2.  Gender differences in clinical presentation and management of patients with acute coronary syndrome in Southwest of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdullah S Assiri
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2011-01-09

3.  Serum Creatine Kinase-MB Isoenzyme Activity among Subjects with Uncomplicated Essential Hypertension: Any Sex Differences.

Authors:  Mathias Abiodun Emokpae; Goodluck O N A Nwagbara
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-27

4.  Glycated Hemoglobin as a Predictor of the Length of Hospital Stay in Patients Following Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery in the Saudi Population.

Authors:  Joud G Almogati; Elnazeer O Ahmed
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb

5.  Do low-income coronary artery bypass surgery patients have equal opportunity to access excellent quality of care and enjoy good outcome in Taiwan?

Authors:  Tsung-Hsien Yu; Yu-Chang Hou; Kuo-Piao Chung
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2014-09-10

6.  Gender inequality in acute coronary syndrome patients at Omdurman Teaching Hospital, Sudan.

Authors:  Hyder O Mirghani; Mohammed A Elnour; Akasha M Taha; Abdulateef S Elbadawi
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2016 May-Aug
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.