Literature DB >> 28429658

Sex differences in utilization and outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with proximal lower extremity deep venous thrombosis - Insights from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Vladimir Lakhter1, Chad J Zack2, Yevgeniy Brailovsky3, Saurav Chatterjee1, Vikas Aggarwal1, Koneti A Rao4, Deborah Crabbe1, Huaqing Zhao5, Eric Choi6, Raghu Kolluri7, Riyaz Bashir1.   

Abstract

Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is being increasingly used for the treatment of proximal lower extremity (LE) deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, sex differences in utilization and safety outcomes of CDT in these patients are unknown. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to identify all patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of proximal LE or caval DVT who underwent CDT between January 2005 and December 2011 in the United States. We evaluated the comparative safety outcomes of CDT among a propensity-matched group of 1731 men versus 1731 women. Among 108,243 patients with proximal LE or caval DVT, 4826 patients (4.5%) underwent CDT. Overall, women underwent CDT less often compared to men (4.1% vs 4.9%, p<0.01, respectively). The rates of CDT increased between 2005 and 2011 for both women (2.1% to 5.9%, p<0.01) and men (2.5% to 7.5%, p<0.01). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (1.2% vs 1.3%, p=0.76). Women were noted to have higher rates of blood transfusions (11.7% vs 8.8%, p<0.01), but lower rates of intracranial hemorrhage (0.5% vs 1.2%, p=0.03) and gastrointestinal bleeding (0.9% vs 2.2%, p<0.01) compared with men. Women were more likely to undergo inferior vena cava filter placement (37.0% vs 32.1%, p<0.01). In this large nationwide cohort, women with proximal DVT were less likely to receive CDT compared to men. Although mortality rates were similar, women were noted to have higher blood transfusion rates while men had more episodes of intracranial and gastrointestinal bleeding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  administrative data; deep vein thrombosis; lower extremity; safety outcomes; sex differences; thrombolytic therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28429658      PMCID: PMC5722654          DOI: 10.1177/1358863X17694091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Med        ISSN: 1358-863X            Impact factor:   3.239


  30 in total

1.  Gender differences in the treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry.

Authors:  C Maynard; P E Litwin; J S Martin; W D Weaver
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-05

2.  Possible gender-related differences in the risk-to-benefit ratio of thrombolysis for acute submassive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Annette Geibel; Manfred Olschewski; Manfred Zehender; Mareile Wilsch; Katja Odening; Fritz Heinrich; Wolfgang Kasper; Stavros Konstantinides
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: large-scale observations from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) National Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Andra L Blomkalns; Anita Y Chen; Judith S Hochman; Eric D Peterson; Kelly Trynosky; Deborah B Diercks; Gerard X Brogan; William E Boden; Matthew T Roe; E Magnus Ohman; W Brian Gibler; L Kristin Newby
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone to treat lower-extremity proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Riyaz Bashir; Chad J Zack; Huaqing Zhao; Anthony J Comerota; Alfred A Bove
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  K A Schulman; J A Berlin; W Harless; J F Kerner; S Sistrunk; B J Gersh; R Dubé; C K Taleghani; J E Burke; S Williams; J M Eisenberg; J J Escarce
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-02-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism and risk of all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Saurav Chatterjee; Anasua Chakraborty; Ido Weinberg; Mitul Kadakia; Robert L Wilensky; Partha Sardar; Dharam J Kumbhani; Debabrata Mukherjee; Michael R Jaff; Jay Giri
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Development and validation of an acute kidney injury risk index for patients undergoing general surgery: results from a national data set.

Authors:  Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper; Michael Heung; Andrew L Rosenberg; Michael Englesbe; Amy M Shanks; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 8.  The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Richard H White
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  The sex difference in haemoglobin levels in adults - mechanisms, causes, and consequences.

Authors:  William G Murphy
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 8.250

10.  Risk of postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery--development and validation of a risk score and effect of acute kidney injury on survival: observational cohort study.

Authors:  Samira Bell; Friedo W Dekker; Thenmalar Vadiveloo; Charis Marwick; Harshal Deshmukh; Peter T Donnan; Merel Van Diepen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-11-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Use of Chronic Care Management Codes for Medicare Beneficiaries: a Missed Opportunity?

Authors:  Rebekah L Gardner; Rouba Youssef; Blake Morphis; Alyssa DaCunha; Kimberly Pelland; Emily Cooper
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.128

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.