Harmony R Reynolds1, Leslee J Shaw2, James K Min2, John A Spertus3, Bernard R Chaitman4, Daniel S Berman5, Michael H Picard6, Raymond Y Kwong7, C Noel Bairey-Merz8, Derek D Cyr9, Renato D Lopes9, Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon10, Claes Held11, Hanna Szwed12, Roxy Senior13, Gilbert Gosselin14, Rajesh Gopalan Nair15, Ahmed Elghamaz13, Olga Bockeria16, Jiyan Chen17, Alexander M Chernyavskiy18, Balram Bhargava19, Jonathan D Newman1, Sasa B Hinic20, Joanna Jaroch21, Angela Hoye22, Jeffrey Berger1, William E Boden23, Sean M O'Brien9, David J Maron24, Judith S Hochman1. 1. NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York. 2. Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 3. UMKC School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri. 4. St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 5. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 6. Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston. 7. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 8. Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California. 9. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina. 10. Hospital Universitario La Paz. Idipaz. UAM. CIBER-CV, Madrid, Spain. 11. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 12. National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland. 13. Northwick Park Hospital-Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 14. Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 15. Government Medical College, Kerla, India. 16. National Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Moscow, Russia. 17. Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China. 18. E.Meshalkin National medical research center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (E.Meshalkin NMRC), Moscow, Russia. 19. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. 20. UHC Bezanijska kosa, Belgrade, Serbia. 21. Wroclaw Medical University, T. Marciniak Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland. 22. The University of Hull/Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, United Kingdom. 23. VA New England Healthcare System/Boston, Boston, Massachusetts. 24. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Abstract
Importance: While many features of stable ischemic heart disease vary by sex, differences in ischemia, coronary anatomy, and symptoms by sex have not been investigated among patients with moderate or severe ischemia. The enrolled ISCHEMIA trial cohort that underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) was required to have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) for randomization. Objective: To describe sex differences in stress testing, CCTA findings, and symptoms in ISCHEMIA trial participants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of the multicenter ISCHEMIA randomized clinical trial analyzed baseline characteristics of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. Individuals were enrolled from July 2012 to January 2018 based on local reading of moderate or severe ischemia on a stress test, after which blinded CCTA was performed in most. Core laboratories reviewed stress tests and CCTAs. Participants with no obstructive CAD or with left main CAD of 50% or greater were excluded. Those who met eligibility criteria including CCTA (if performed) were randomized to a routine invasive or a conservative management strategy (N = 5179). Angina was assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Analysis began October 1, 2018. Interventions: CCTA and angina assessment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sex differences in stress test, CCTA findings, and symptom severity. Results: Of 8518 patients enrolled, 6256 (77%) were men. Women were more likely to have no obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis in all vessels on CCTA) (353 of 1022 [34.4%] vs 378 of 3353 [11.3%]). Of individuals who were randomized, women had more angina at baseline than men (median [interquartile range] Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency score: 80 [70-100] vs 90 [70-100]). Women had less severe ischemia on stress imaging (383 of 919 [41.7%] vs 1361 of 2972 [45.9%] with severe ischemia; 386 of 919 [42.0%] vs 1215 of 2972 [40.9%] with moderate ischemia; and 150 of 919 [16.4%] vs 394 of 2972 [13.3%] with mild or no ischemia). Ischemia was similar by sex on exercise tolerance testing. Women had less extensive CAD on CCTA (205 of 568 women [36%] vs 1142 of 2418 men [47%] with 3-vessel disease; 184 of 568 women [32%] vs 754 of 2418 men [31%] with 2-vessel disease; and 178 of 568 women [31%] vs 519 of 2418 men [22%] with 1-vessel disease). Female sex was independently associated with greater angina frequency (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.13-1.76). Conclusions and Relevance: Women in the ISCHEMIA trial had more frequent angina, independent of less extensive CAD, and less severe ischemia than men. These findings reflect inherent sex differences in the complex relationships between angina, atherosclerosis, and ischemia that may have implications for testing and treatment of patients with suspected stable ischemic heart disease. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01471522.
Importance: While many features of stable ischemic heart disease vary by sex, differences in ischemia, coronary anatomy, and symptoms by sex have not been investigated among patients with moderate or severe ischemia. The enrolled ISCHEMIA trial cohort that underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) was required to have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) for randomization. Objective: To describe sex differences in stress testing, CCTA findings, and symptoms in ISCHEMIA trial participants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of the multicenter ISCHEMIA randomized clinical trial analyzed baseline characteristics of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. Individuals were enrolled from July 2012 to January 2018 based on local reading of moderate or severe ischemia on a stress test, after which blinded CCTA was performed in most. Core laboratories reviewed stress tests and CCTAs. Participants with no obstructive CAD or with left main CAD of 50% or greater were excluded. Those who met eligibility criteria including CCTA (if performed) were randomized to a routine invasive or a conservative management strategy (N = 5179). Angina was assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Analysis began October 1, 2018. Interventions: CCTA and angina assessment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sex differences in stress test, CCTA findings, and symptom severity. Results: Of 8518 patients enrolled, 6256 (77%) were men. Women were more likely to have no obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis in all vessels on CCTA) (353 of 1022 [34.4%] vs 378 of 3353 [11.3%]). Of individuals who were randomized, women had more angina at baseline than men (median [interquartile range] Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency score: 80 [70-100] vs 90 [70-100]). Women had less severe ischemia on stress imaging (383 of 919 [41.7%] vs 1361 of 2972 [45.9%] with severe ischemia; 386 of 919 [42.0%] vs 1215 of 2972 [40.9%] with moderate ischemia; and 150 of 919 [16.4%] vs 394 of 2972 [13.3%] with mild or no ischemia). Ischemia was similar by sex on exercise tolerance testing. Women had less extensive CAD on CCTA (205 of 568 women [36%] vs 1142 of 2418 men [47%] with 3-vessel disease; 184 of 568 women [32%] vs 754 of 2418 men [31%] with 2-vessel disease; and 178 of 568 women [31%] vs 519 of 2418 men [22%] with 1-vessel disease). Female sex was independently associated with greater angina frequency (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.13-1.76). Conclusions and Relevance: Women in the ISCHEMIA trial had more frequent angina, independent of less extensive CAD, and less severe ischemia than men. These findings reflect inherent sex differences in the complex relationships between angina, atherosclerosis, and ischemia that may have implications for testing and treatment of patients with suspected stable ischemic heart disease. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01471522.
Authors: Thomas M Maddox; Maggie A Stanislawski; Gary K Grunwald; Steven M Bradley; P Michael Ho; Thomas T Tsai; Manesh R Patel; Amneet Sandhu; Javier Valle; David J Magid; Benjamin Leon; Deepak L Bhatt; Stephan D Fihn; John S Rumsfeld Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Edward L Hannan; Louise Szypulski Farrell; Gary Walford; Alice K Jacobs; Peter B Berger; David R Holmes; Nicholas J Stamato; Samin Sharma; Spencer B King Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Subroto Acharjee; Koon K Teo; Alice K Jacobs; Pamela M Hartigan; Kulpreet Barn; Gilbert Gosselin; Jean-Francois Tanguay; David J Maron; William J Kostuk; Bernard R Chaitman; G B John Mancini; John A Spertus; Marcin R Dada; Eric R Bates; David C Booth; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; William E Boden Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2015-07-26 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Philippe Gabriel Steg; Nicola Greenlaw; Michal Tendera; Jean-Claude Tardif; Roberto Ferrari; Muayed Al-Zaibag; Paul Dorian; Dayi Hu; Svetlana Shalnova; Fernando José Sokn; Ian Ford; Kim M Fox Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Michael H Picard; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond Y Kwong; Gregg W Stone; Roxy Senior; James K Min; Rory Hachamovitch; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Jennifer H Mieres; Thomas H Marwick; Lawrence M Phillips; Farooq A Chaudhry; Patricia A Pellikka; Piotr Slomka; Andrew E Arai; Ami E Iskandrian; Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; Todd D Miller; Eike Nagel; Abhinav Goyal; Salvador Borges-Neto; William E Boden; Harmony R Reynolds; Judith S Hochman; David J Maron; Pamela S Douglas Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-06
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine; Steven E Reis; Vera Bittner; Sheryl F Kelsey; Marian Olson; B Delia Johnson; Sunil Mankad; Barry L Sharaf; William J Rogers; Timothy R Wessel; Christopher B Arant; Gerald M Pohost; Amir Lerman; Arshed A Quyyumi; George Sopko Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-02-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Roberto Ferrari; Hélène Abergel; Ian Ford; Kim M Fox; Nicola Greenlaw; Ph Gabriel Steg; Dayi Hu; Michal Tendera; Jean-Claude Tardif Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2012-09-15 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: G B John Mancini; Eric R Bates; David J Maron; Pamela Hartigan; Marcin Dada; Gilbert Gosselin; William Kostuk; Steven P Sedlis; Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Peter B Berger; John Spertus; Kreton Mavromatis; Merril Knudtson; Bernard R Chaitman; Robert A O'Rourke; William S Weintraub; Koon Teo; William E Boden Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2009-06-02
Authors: Harmony R Reynolds; C Noel Bairey Merz; Colin Berry; Rohit Samuel; Jacqueline Saw; Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Ana Carolina do A H de Souza; Robert Sykes; Viviany R Taqueti; Janet Wei Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Nidaa Mikail; Alexia Rossi; Susan Bengs; Ahmed Haider; Barbara E Stähli; Angela Portmann; Alessio Imperiale; Valerie Treyer; Alexander Meisel; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Michael Messerli; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel; Cathérine Gebhard Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Rajat Kalra; Shray Malik; Ko-Hsuan Amy Chen; Fredrick Ogugua; Pal Satyajit Singh Athwal; Andrew C Elton; Pratik S Velangi; Mohamed F Ismail; Sanya Chhikara; Jeremy S Markowitz; Prabhjot S Nijjar; Lisa von Wald; Henri Roukoz; Maneesh Bhargava; David Perlman; Chetan Shenoy Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2021-09-01
Authors: Peyman N Azadani; Robert J H Miller; Tali Sharir; Marcio A Diniz; Lien-Hsin Hu; Yuka Otaki; Heidi Gransar; Joanna X Liang; Evann Eisenberg; Andrew J Einstein; Mathews B Fish; Terrence D Ruddy; Philipp A Kaufmann; Albert J Sinusas; Edward J Miller; Timothy M Bateman; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo Di Carli; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-08-19
Authors: Angela H E M Maas; Giuseppe Rosano; Renata Cifkova; Alaide Chieffo; Dorenda van Dijken; Haitham Hamoda; Vijay Kunadian; Ellen Laan; Irene Lambrinoudaki; Kate Maclaran; Nick Panay; John C Stevenson; Mick van Trotsenburg; Peter Collins Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2021-03-07 Impact factor: 29.983