Literature DB >> 7753950

Effects of implicit memory on explicit recall: set size and word-frequency effects.

D L Nelson1, J Xu.   

Abstract

PIER was designed to explain findings related to tasks involving an encoding phase and a testing phase in which retrieval cues prime the recovery of what has been encoded. The model assumes that retrieval cues initiate the sampling of associated memories linked to the encoded information and that sampled memories are subjected to a recognition check to determine whether they meet criteria specified by the purpose of the retrieval. The model explains how the number of implicitly activated associates linked to a studied word affects its later recovery and predicts that words infrequently experienced will be recovered with greater likelihood than words frequently experienced. This prediction was tested and confirmed in two experiments in which the associative set size and the frequency of the studied words were manipulated. Implications for the study of implicit memory are considered.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7753950     DOI: 10.1007/BF00431281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  19 in total

1.  The retrieval of controlled and automatic aspects of meaning on direct and indirect tests.

Authors:  D L Nelson; T A Schreiber; P E Holley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

2.  Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency.

Authors:  A M GORMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1961-01

Review 3.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering.

Authors:  H L Roediger
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1990-09

4.  Inhibiting effects of recall.

Authors:  H L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1974-03

5.  Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects.

Authors:  P Graf; D L Schacter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The effects of natural category size on memory for episodic encodings.

Authors:  D L Nelson; J Canas; M T Bajo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-03

7.  Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: attentional priming, learning, and resonance.

Authors:  S Grossberg; G Stone
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Implicit memory: effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall.

Authors:  D L Nelson; D J Bennett; N R Gee; T A Schreiber; V M McKinney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Associative asymmetry, availability, and retrieval.

Authors:  D C Rubin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-01

10.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.

Authors:  G Gillund; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  9 in total

1.  The ties that bind what is known to the recall of what is new.

Authors:  D L Nelson; N Zhang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

2.  What is this thing called frequency?

Authors:  D L Nelson; C L McEvoy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-06

3.  Experiencing a word can prime its accessibility and its associative connections to related words.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Leilani B Goodmon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

4.  Recursive reminding: effects of repetition, printed frequency, connectivity, and set size on recognition and judgments of frequency.

Authors:  Serena L Fisher; Douglas L Nelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

5.  Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: tests of the order-encoding view.

Authors:  Paul S Merritt; Edward L DeLosh; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

6.  How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Serena L Fisher; Umit Akirmak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

7.  Instability in memory phenomena: a common puzzle and a unifying explanation.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

8.  Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses.

Authors:  T A Schreiber
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-05

9.  One step is not enough: making better use of association norms to predict cued recall.

Authors:  D L Nelson; D J Bennett; T W Leibert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.