Literature DB >> 11206201

The ties that bind what is known to the recall of what is new.

D L Nelson1, N Zhang.   

Abstract

Cued recall success varies with what people know and with what they do during an episode. This paper focuses on prior knowledge and disentangles the relative effects of 10 features of words and their relationships on cued recall. Results are reported for correlational and multiple regression analyses of data obtained from free association norms and from 29 experiments. The 10 features were only weakly correlated with each other in the norms and, with notable exceptions, in the experiments. The regression analysis indicated that forward cue-to-target strength explained the most variance, followed by backward target-to-cue strength. Target connectivity and set size explained the next most variance, along with mediated cue-to-target strength. Finally, frequency, concreteness, shared associate strength, and cue set size also contributed significantly to recall. Taken together, indices of prior word knowledge explain 49% of the recall variance. Theoretically driven equations that use free association to predict cued recall were also evaluated. Each equation was designed to condense multiple indices of word interconnectivity into a single predictor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11206201     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  What is this thing called frequency?

Authors:  D L Nelson; C L McEvoy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-06

2.  Cue set size effects: sampling activated associates or cross-target interference?

Authors:  D L Nelson; T A Schreiber; J Xu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

3.  The retrieval of controlled and automatic aspects of meaning on direct and indirect tests.

Authors:  D L Nelson; T A Schreiber; P E Holley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

4.  Associative clustering during recall.

Authors:  J J JENKINS; W A RUSSELL
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1952-10

5.  One step is not enough: making better use of association norms to predict cued recall.

Authors:  D L Nelson; D J Bennett; T W Leibert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

6.  Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition.

Authors:  D L Nelson; V M McKinney; N R Gee; G A Janczura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Predicting which words get recalled: measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns.

Authors:  D C Rubin; M Friendly
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-01

8.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.

Authors:  A Paivio; J C Yuille; S A Madigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-01

9.  Implicit memory: effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall.

Authors:  D L Nelson; D J Bennett; N R Gee; T A Schreiber; V M McKinney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: memory retrieval as a model case.

Authors:  M C Anderson; B A Spellman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  21 in total

1.  Experiencing a word can prime its accessibility and its associative connections to related words.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Leilani B Goodmon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

2.  Are implicitly activated associates selectively activated?

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Vanesa M McKinney; Cathy L McEvoy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

3.  Disrupting attention: the need for retrieval cues in working memory theories.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Leilani B Goodmon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

4.  Strengthening the activation of unconsciously activated memories.

Authors:  Leilani B Goodmon; Douglas L Nelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

5.  What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Gunvor M Dyrdal; Leilani B Goodmon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

6.  Recursive reminding: effects of repetition, printed frequency, connectivity, and set size on recognition and judgments of frequency.

Authors:  Serena L Fisher; Douglas L Nelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

7.  How does delayed testing reduce effects of implicit memory: context infusion or cuing with context?

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Leilani B Goodmon; David Ceo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

8.  Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: tests of the order-encoding view.

Authors:  Paul S Merritt; Edward L DeLosh; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

9.  How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Serena L Fisher; Umit Akirmak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

10.  The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Kit Ying Chan; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.