Literature DB >> 18047228

Effects of differing response-force requirements on food-maintained responding in CD-1 mice.

Troy J Zarcone1, Rong Chen, Stephen C Fowler.   

Abstract

The effect of force requirements on response effort was examined using outbred (CD-1) mice trained to press a disk with their snout. Lateral peak forces greater than 2 g were defined as threshold responses (i.e., all measured responses). Different force requirements were used to define criterion responses (a subclass of threshold responses) that exceeded the requirement. The reinforcer was sweetened, condensed milk, and it was delivered upon response termination. All mice were exposed to two ascending series of criterion force requirements (2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 g). Increasing the force requirement decreased criterion response rates, but increased threshold response rates. The time-integral of force (area under the force-time curve for individual responses, which is proportional to energy expenditure for each response) increased with the increase in the force requirement. These results conflict with the hypothesis that higher force requirements have aversive qualities and suggest that increased force requirements are more analogous to intermittent schedules of reinforcement. These data suggest that estimations of effort or energy expenditure should be measured independently of the force requirement. Individual differences in responding were found for the CD-1 outbred stock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18047228      PMCID: PMC2174377          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.88-381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

Review 1.  Exotic mice as models for aging research: polemic and prospectus.

Authors:  R A Miller; S Austad; D Burke; C Chrisp; R Dysko; A Galecki; A Jackson; V Monnier
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 2.  Warning: the use of heterogeneous mice may seriously damage your research.

Authors:  M F Festing
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  The influence of work on behavior.

Authors:  R L SOLOMON
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1948-01       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 4.  Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy.

Authors:  N R Richardson; D C Roberts
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Force, shortening, and work in muscular contraction: relative contributions to overall energy utilization.

Authors:  F F Jobsis; J C Duffield
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Escape from an effortful situation.

Authors:  L K Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The effects of differing response-force requirements on fixed-ratio responding of rats.

Authors:  K Alling; A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Behavioral thermoregulation in the squirrel monkey when response effort is varied.

Authors:  E R Adair; B A Wright
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1976-02

9.  Mouse strains differ under a simple schedule of operant learning.

Authors:  S P Baron; L T Meltzer
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-01-29       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Differential acquisition of food-reinforced disk pressing by CD-1, BALB/cJ and C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Troy J Zarcone; Rong Chen; Stephen C Fowler
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of differing response-force requirements on food-maintained responding in C57Bl/6J mice.

Authors:  Troy J Zarcone; Rong Chen; Stephen C Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The isolation of motivational, motoric, and schedule effects on operant performance: a modeling approach.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Timothy H C Cheung; Janet L Neisewander; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.