Literature DB >> 27182088

Contingency Enhances Sensitivity to Loss in a Gambling Task with Diminishing Returns.

Jonathan R Miller1, Iser G DeLeon2, Lisa M Toole3, Gregory A Lieving4, Melissa J Allman5.   

Abstract

This study examined whether gambling behavior under conditions of diminishing returns differed between participants with histories of contingent (CD group) and noncontingent (NCD group) token delivery. In Phase 1, CD participants accrued tokens by correctly completing a discrimination task; for NCD participants, token accrual was yoked to token delivery of CD participants. In Phase 2, participants could choose to gamble their tokens or end the experiment and exchange their tokens for money. During the gambling task, participants could bet one token per trial. The probability of losses began at 10% and increased incrementally across blocks of 10 trials up to 100%. Overall, participants in the CD group gambled on fewer trials than participants in the NCD group. Costs of token accrual during Phase 1, in terms of number of trials and duration, showed a positive correlation with net tokens for the CD group but not the NCD group. Results are consistent with previous research demonstrating the value-enhancing effects of both prior contingent delivery and effort, and offer evidence that these histories influence sensitivity to loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gambling; reinforcer value; stimulus value; within-trial contrast

Year:  2016        PMID: 27182088      PMCID: PMC4865260          DOI: 10.1007/s40732-016-0172-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rec        ISSN: 0033-2933


  24 in total

Review 1.  A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Greater effort boosts the affective taste properties of food.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Failure to replicate the 'work ethic" effect in pigeons.

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Peter J Urcuioli; Karen M Lionello-DeNolf
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Failure to obtain value enhancement by within-trial contrast in simultaneous and successive discriminations.

Authors:  Joana Arantes; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulue correlated with extinction or increased effort.

Authors:  M Perone; A Baron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Understanding preference shifts: a review and alternate explanation of within-trial contrast and state-dependent valuation.

Authors:  James N Meindl
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2012

7.  Establishing operations.

Authors:  J Michael
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1993

8.  Response perseveration in psychopaths.

Authors:  J P Newman; C M Patterson; D S Kosson
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1987-05

9.  Escape from an effortful situation.

Authors:  L K Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Preference for rewards that follow greater effort and greater delay.

Authors:  Jérôme Alessandri; Jean-Claude Darcheville; Yvonne Delevoye-Turrell; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.