Literature DB >> 15628984

The effects of McKenzie and Brunkow exercise program on spinal mobility comparative study.

Emela Mujić Skikić1, Suad Trebinjac, Slavica Sakota, Dijana Avdić.   

Abstract

This study encompassed 64 participants with symptoms of low back pain, 33 in McKenzie group and 31 in Brunkow group. Patients attended exercise program daily and they were asked to do the same exercise at home--five times a day in series of 5 to 10 repetition each time, depending of stage of disease and pain intensity. All patients were assessed for the spinal motion, before and after the treatment. All parameters for spinal movements showed improvement after exercising McKenzie program for lower back pain with a significant difference of p<0.01 for all motions. Also, in Brunkow group, all of the parameters showed statistically significant improvement at the end of treatment in relation to pre-treatment values, with significant difference of p<0.01 for all motions. Statistically comparison between McKenzie and Brunkow difference in score at the end of the treatment showed statistically significant improvement in McKenzie group, for extension, right and left side flexion, while flexion score didn't show statistically significant difference. McKenzie exercises seemed to be more effective than Brunkow exercises for improvement in spinal motion. Both, McKenzie and Brunkow exercises can be used for spinal mobility improvement in patients with lower back pain, but is preferable to use McKenzie exercises first, to decrease the pain and increase spinal mobility, and then Brunkow exercises to strengthen the paravertebral muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15628984      PMCID: PMC7245530          DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2004.3466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 1512-8601            Impact factor:   3.363


  20 in total

1.  Conservative treatment of acute low-back pain, a prospective randomized trial: McKenzie method of treatment versus patient education in mini-back school.

Authors:  C K Fernando
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  The role of exercise in the prevention and management of acute low back pain.

Authors:  B A Casazza; J L Young; S A Herring
Journal:  Occup Med       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar

Review 3.  Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions.

Authors:  M W van Tulder; B W Koes; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Exercises: which ones are worth trying, for which patients, and when?

Authors:  A Faas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Lumbar segmental rigidity: can its identification with facet injections and stretching exercises be useful?

Authors:  T G Mayer; R Robinson; P Pegues; S Kohles; R J Gatchel
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  The McKenzie approach to evaluating and treating low back pain.

Authors:  R Donelson
Journal:  Orthop Rev       Date:  1990-08

7.  A randomized trial of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain. Efficacy on sickness absence.

Authors:  A Faas; J T van Eijk; A W Chavannes; J W Gubbels
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Conservative treatment in patients sick-listed for acute low-back pain: a prospective randomised study with 12 months' follow-up.

Authors:  T Seferlis; G Németh; A M Carlsson; P Gillström
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Diagnosis and management of low back pain and sciatica.

Authors:  A H Wheeler
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.292

10.  Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments.

Authors:  D U Jette; A M Jette
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1996-09
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Does targeting manual therapy and/or exercise improve patient outcomes in nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review.

Authors:  Peter Kent; Hanne L Mjøsund; Ditte H D Petersen
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Optimizing treatment protocols for spinal manipulative therapy: study protocol for a randomized trial.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Jason A Sharpe; Elizabeth Lane; Doug Santillo; Tom Greene; Gregory Kawchuk
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.