Literature DB >> 7747174

Femoral anteversion measured by ultrasound and CT: a comparative study.

A Aamodt1, T Terjesen, J Eine, K A Kvistad.   

Abstract

Both computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography have been used successfully to estimate the femoral anteversion (AV) angle. In this study, AV angles in 20 human adult femurs were determined by ultrasonography and CT and the measurements compared. On CT the real AV angle was measured as the angle between the head-neck centreline and the posterior condylar plane. In addition, the angle between the anterior head-trochanter (HT) tangent and the posterior condylar plane was determined. The latter angle was also measured by ultrasonography using the tilted transducer technique. The mean interobserver variation in the ultrasound measurements was 1.9 degrees. We found ultrasonography to correlate very well with CT, both when comparing with the HT angle (r = 0.95) and with the AV angle (r = 0.93). The HT angle was on average 4 degrees greater than the AV angle. In this study the accuracy of ultrasonography was +/- 5 degrees and the method is recommended for screening in patients with rotational disorders of the femur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7747174     DOI: 10.1007/BF00198071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  1 in total

1.  [Determination of rotational defects of the femur by computer tomographic determination of the antetorsion angle of the femoral neck].

Authors:  H Wissing; G Spira
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1986-02
  1 in total
  5 in total

1.  Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 2: 3D modelling method.

Authors:  J S Kim; T S Park; S B Park; J S Kim; I Y Kim; S I Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The impact of tibial torsion measurements on gait analysis kinematics.

Authors:  Paulo Roberto Garcia Lucareli; Nadia Maria Santos; Wagner De Godoy; Milena Moreira Barreto Bernal; Angela Tavares Paes; Amancio Ramalho Junior
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 3.  Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement.

Authors:  Matteo Scorcelletti; Neil D Reeves; Jörn Rittweger; Alex Ireland
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  An MRI-based technique for assessment of lower extremity deformities-reproducibility, accuracy, and clinical application.

Authors:  Stefan Hinterwimmer; Heiko Graichen; Thomas J Vogl; Nasreddin Abolmaali
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  Impact of specialty and level of training on CT measurement of femoral version: an interobserver agreement analysis.

Authors:  Richard S Yoon; John D Koerner; Neeraj M Patel; Michael S Sirkin; Mark C Reilly; Frank A Liporace
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-08-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.