Paulo Roberto Garcia Lucareli1, Nadia Maria Santos2, Wagner De Godoy3, Milena Moreira Barreto Bernal3, Angela Tavares Paes4, Amancio Ramalho Junior3. 1. Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 2. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 3. Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 4. Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare tibial torsion values as assessed by goniometry and three-dimensional kinematics. In addition, the impact of each one of these measurements on kinematic and kinetic results for normal gait was determined. METHODS: Twenty-three healthy and fully ambulatory patients were assessed, 11 women and 12 men, from 20 to 40 years old. Data were collected at a laboratory for the three-dimensional analysis of movement with 10 cameras and two force plates. Tibial torsion measurements were obtained using goniometry and three-dimensional kinematics based on the Plug-in Gait model. Afterwards, both procedures were compared, and the impact of each result was assessed on the kinematic and kinetic modeling of the knee and ankle. RESULTS: Pearson's linear correlation coefficient (r=0,504) showed a moderate correlation between the three-dimensional kinematics and goniometry, and between the changes in the measurements. Regarding the processed kinematic and kinetic results for every torsion position, no significant differences were noticed among any of the studied variables (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Although statistical correlation among tibial torsion angles by goniometry and three-dimensional kinematic were moderate, kinematic and kinetic analysis of the joints did not reveal any significant changes. Level of Evidence I, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.
OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare tibial torsion values as assessed by goniometry and three-dimensional kinematics. In addition, the impact of each one of these measurements on kinematic and kinetic results for normal gait was determined. METHODS: Twenty-three healthy and fully ambulatory patients were assessed, 11 women and 12 men, from 20 to 40 years old. Data were collected at a laboratory for the three-dimensional analysis of movement with 10 cameras and two force plates. Tibial torsion measurements were obtained using goniometry and three-dimensional kinematics based on the Plug-in Gait model. Afterwards, both procedures were compared, and the impact of each result was assessed on the kinematic and kinetic modeling of the knee and ankle. RESULTS: Pearson's linear correlation coefficient (r=0,504) showed a moderate correlation between the three-dimensional kinematics and goniometry, and between the changes in the measurements. Regarding the processed kinematic and kinetic results for every torsion position, no significant differences were noticed among any of the studied variables (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Although statistical correlation among tibial torsion angles by goniometry and three-dimensional kinematic were moderate, kinematic and kinetic analysis of the joints did not reveal any significant changes. Level of Evidence I, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.
Authors: Sang Hyeong Lee; Chin Youb Chung; Moon Seok Park; In Ho Choi; Tae-Joon Cho Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 4.176