Literature DB >> 7744705

A model of frequency tuning in the basilar papilla of the Tokay gecko, Gekko gecko.

S Authier1, G A Manley.   

Abstract

This paper uses the quantitative details of the anatomy of the auditory papilla in the Tokay gecko Gekko gecko (as described in the companion paper) to make a quantitative model predicting the tonotopic organization of two of the three papillar areas. Assuming that hair-cell bundle stiffness is similar to that of other species, a model of resonance frequencies for the apical areas of the papilla was constructed, taking into account factors such as the number of hair cells per resonant unit, their bundle dimensions, the volume of the tectorial mass, etc. The model predicts that the apical pre- and postaxial areas, although anatomically adjacent, respond to different frequency ranges, a phenomenon not yet reported from any vertebrate. The model predicts that together, these areas respond best to frequencies between 1.1 and 5.3 kHz, close to the range found physiologically [Eatock et al. (1981) J. Comp. Physiol. 142, 203-218] (0.8 to 5 kHz) for the high-frequency range for this species. Only physiological experiments tracing responses to specific papillar nerve fibres can confirm or refute these interesting predictions of the model. The model also indicates that, compared to free-standing hair-cell bundles, the semi-isolated tectorial structures called sallets not only lower the range of characteristic frequencies but also increase the frequency selectivity of the attached hair cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7744705     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)00138-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  13 in total

1.  Cochlear mechanisms from a phylogenetic viewpoint.

Authors:  G A Manley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sound-induced motions of individual cochlear hair bundles.

Authors:  A J Aranyosi; Dennis M Freeman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; David S Velenovsky; Kevin E Bonine
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Frequency clustering in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions from a lizard's ear.

Authors:  Andrej Vilfan; Thomas Duke
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Travelling waves and tonotopicity in the inner ear: a historical and comparative perspective.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification?

Authors:  Anthony W Peng; Anthony J Ricci
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Comparative Auditory Neuroscience: Understanding the Evolution and Function of Ears.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-18

9.  Interactions between hair cells shape spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a model of the tokay gecko's cochlea.

Authors:  Michael Gelfand; Oreste Piro; Marcelo O Magnasco; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Diverse Mechanisms of Sound Frequency Discrimination in the Vertebrate Cochlea.

Authors:  Robert Fettiplace
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 13.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.