Literature DB >> 7741852

The management of acute myocardial infarction: guidelines and audit standards. Report of a workshop of the Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and the Royal College of Physicians.

D P De Bono1, A Hopkins.   

Abstract

Successful management of acute myocardial infarction depends in the first instance on the patient recognising the symptoms and seeking help as quickly as possible. Once in hospital, fast track admission procedures and protocols for pain relief, early thrombolysis and appropriate ancillary measures (eg aspirin, i.v. betablockers) should be promptly instituted. Specialist advice and, if necessary, transfer to specialist unit should be considered if additional complications arise. Follow-up management after discharge from hospital requires cooperation between primary and secondary care to prolong survival by reducing risk factors, using aspirin, betablockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and instituting a suitable rehabilitation programme. Audit measures are included in the report to help general practitioners and hospital doctors review their practice and assess it against the standards set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7741852      PMCID: PMC5401077     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond        ISSN: 0035-8819


  25 in total

1.  Working party report on cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  J Horgan; H Bethell; P Carson; C Davidson; D Julian; R A Mayou; R Nagle
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-05

2.  Treatable arrhythmias in cardiac arrests seen outside hospital.

Authors:  M C Colquhoun; D G Julian
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-05-09       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  The value of lowering cholesterol after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J E Rossouw; B Lewis; B M Rifkind
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-10-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Safety and efficacy of repeat thrombolytic treatment after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H D White; D B Cross; B F Williams; R M Norris
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-09

5.  SWIFT trial of delayed elective intervention v conservative treatment after thrombolysis with anistreplase in acute myocardial infarction. SWIFT (Should We Intervene Following Thrombolysis?) Trial Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-09

6.  Intravenous magnesium sulphate in suspected acute myocardial infarction: results of the second Leicester Intravenous Magnesium Intervention Trial (LIMIT-2)

Authors:  K L Woods; S Fletcher; C Roffe; Y Haider
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-06-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Segmental analysis of coronary arterial stenoses in patients presenting with angina or first myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D P de Bono; A K Bhattacharrya
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Time delays in provision of thrombolytic treatment in six district hospitals. Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and a Cardiology Committee of Royal College of Physicians of London.

Authors:  J S Birkhead
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-22

9.  Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners: Grampian region early anistreplase trial. GREAT Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-05

10.  Comparison of clinical presentation of acute myocardial infarction in patients older than 65 years of age to younger patients: the Multicenter Chest Pain Study experience.

Authors:  C G Solomon; T H Lee; E F Cook; M C Weisberg; D A Brand; G W Rouan; L Goldman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  10 in total

1.  Outcome and use of health services four years after admission for acute myocardial infarction: case record follow up study.

Authors:  M Melville; N Brown; D Gray; T Young; J Hampton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-24

2.  Summary of scientific evidence.

Authors: 
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  2002-02

3.  Cardiac rehabilitation in the United Kingdom: guidelines and audit standards. National Institute for Nursing, the British Cardiac Society and the Royal College of Physicians of London.

Authors:  D R Thompson; G S Bowman; A L Kitson; D P de Bono; A Hopkins
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Minimising delays to thrombolysis in patients developing acute myocardial infarction in hospital.

Authors:  A D Mumford; A P Banning
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 5.  Lisinopril. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the early management of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K L Goa; J A Balfour; G Zuanetti
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Thrombolytic treatment.

Authors:  M Verstraete
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-02

7.  Improving door to needle times with nurse initiated thrombolysis.

Authors:  P Wilmshurst; A Purchase; C Webb; C Jowett; T Quinn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Gender differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R A Raine; N A Black; T J Bowker; D A Wood
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 9.  The management of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S Saltissi; S S Mushahwar
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 10.  Alteplase. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J C Gillis; A J Wagstaff; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 9.546

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.