Literature DB >> 1393033

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners: Grampian region early anistreplase trial. GREAT Group.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners.
DESIGN: Randomised double blind parallel group trial of anistreplase 30 units intravenously and placebo given either at home or in hospital.
SETTING: 29 rural practices in Grampian admitting patients to teaching hospitals in Aberdeen (average distance 36 (range 16-62) miles). PATIENTS: 311 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction and no contraindications to thrombolytic therapy seen at home within four hours of onset of symptoms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time saving, adverse events, Q wave infarction, left ventricular function.
RESULTS: Anistreplase was administered at home 101 minutes after onset of symptoms, while anistreplase was given in hospital 240 minutes after onset of symptoms (median times). Adverse events after thrombolysis were infrequent and, apart from cardiac arrest, not a serious problem when they occurred in the community: seven of 13 patients were resuscitated after cardiac arrest out of hospital. By three months after trial entry the relative reduction of deaths from all causes in patients given thrombolytic therapy at home was 49% (13/163 (8.0%) v 23/148 (15.5%); difference -7.6% (95% confidence interval -14.7% to -0.4%), p = 0.04). Full thickness Q wave infarction was less common in patients with confirmed infarction receiving treatment at home (65/122 (53.3%) v 76/112 (67.9%); difference -14.6% (95% confidence interval -27.0% to -2.2%), p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners provided rapid pre-hospital coronary care of a high standard. Compared with later administration in hospital, giving anistreplase at home resulted in reduction in mortality, fewer cardiac arrests, fewer Q wave infarcts, and better left ventricular function. Benefits were most marked where thrombolytic therapy was administered within two hours of the onset of symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1393033      PMCID: PMC1883310          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.305.6853.548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  18 in total

1.  Treatable arrhythmias in cardiac arrests seen outside hospital.

Authors:  M C Colquhoun; D G Julian
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-05-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Activities of aminotransferases after treatment with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A C Maclennan; N Ahmad; J R Lawrence
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-08-11

3.  "Heartstart Scotland"--initial experience of a national scheme for out of hospital defibrillation.

Authors:  S M Cobbe; M J Redmond; J M Watson; J Hollingworth; D J Carrington
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-22

4.  One thousand heart attacks in Grampian: the place of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in general practice.

Authors:  G R Pai; N E Haites; J M Rawles
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-02-07

5.  The effect of a mobile coronary care unit on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest outside hospital.

Authors:  B Wennerblom; S Holmberg; H Wedel
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  General practitioners' management of acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest: relevance to thrombolytic treatment.

Authors:  J M Rawles
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-09-12

7.  Stroke distance in acute myocardial infarction: a simple measurement of left ventricular function.

Authors:  M J Metcalfe; J M Rawles
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-06-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Temporal dependence of beneficial effects of coronary thrombolysis characterized by positron tomography.

Authors:  S R Bergmann; R A Lerch; K A Fox; P A Ludbrook; M J Welch; M M Ter-Pogossian; B E Sobel
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Assessment of cardiac output by the Doppler ultrasound technique alone.

Authors:  N E Haites; F M McLennan; D H Mowat; J M Rawles
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-02

10.  Patient and general practitioner delays in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J M Rawles; N E Haites
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-03-26
View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Methods in health service research. An introduction to bayesian methods in health technology assessment.

Authors:  D J Spiegelhalter; J P Myles; D R Jones; K R Abrams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-21

2.  GREAT: 10 year survival of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in a randomised comparison of prehospital and hospital thrombolysis.

Authors:  J Rawles
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Cost implications of prehospital emergency drug administration. The case of prehospital thrombolytics.

Authors:  S Barton; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Paramedics and pre-hospital management of acute myocardial infarction: diagnosis and reperfusion.

Authors:  S Johnston; R Brightwell; M Ziman
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  What percentages of patients are suitable for prehospital thrombolysis?

Authors:  N Castle; R Owen; R Vincent; N Ineson
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  The experiences and attitudes of general practitioners and hospital staff towards prehospital thrombolysis in a rural community.

Authors:  D Tedstone Doherty; J Dowling; P Wright; J Cuddihy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Feasibility and long term outcome of home vs hospital initiated thrombolysis.

Authors:  B McAleer; M P S Varma
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 8.  Guidelines to reducing delays in administration of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  W L Williams
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michael McCaul; Andrit Lourens; Tamara Kredo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-10

10.  Prospective observational cohort study of time saved by prehospital thrombolysis for ST elevation myocardial infarction delivered by paramedics.

Authors:  David K Pedley; Kim Bissett; Elizabeth M Connolly; Carol G Goodman; Ian Golding; T H Pringle; G P McNeill; S D Pringle; M C Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.