Literature DB >> 12239207

Gender differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary artery disease.

R A Raine1, N A Black, T J Bowker, D A Wood.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: s: To compare the clinical management and health outcomes of men and women after admission with acute coronary syndromes, after adjusting for disease severity, sociodemographic, and cardiac risk factors.
DESIGN: Prospective national survey of acute cardiac admissions followed up by mailed patient questionnaire two to three years after initial admission.
SETTING: Random sample of 94 district general hospitals in the UK. PATIENTS: 1064 patients under 70 years old recruited between April 1995 and November 1996. MAIN
RESULTS: Of the 1064 patients recruited, 126 (11.8%) died before follow up. Of the 938 survivors, 719 (76.7%) completed a follow up questionnaire. There were no gender differences in the use of cardiac investigations during the index admission or follow up period. However, male patients with hypertension were more likely to undergo rehabilitation compared with female hypertensive patients (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.85 to 4.72). Men were also more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) than women (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.21 to 3.00), but there was no gender difference in the use of revascularisation overall (p=0.14). An indirect indication that the gender differences in CABG were not attributable to bias was provided by the lack of gender differences in health outcomes, which implies that patients received the care they needed.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the extensive international literature referring to a gender bias in favour of men with coronary heart disease, this national survey found no gender differences in the use of investigations or in revascularisation overall. However, the criteria used for selecting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with CABG requires further investigation as does the use of rehabilitation. It is unclear whether the clinical decisions to provide these procedures are made solely on the basis of clinical need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12239207      PMCID: PMC1732030          DOI: 10.1136/jech.56.10.791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  27 in total

1.  The Yentl syndrome.

Authors:  B Healy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Referral patterns and exercise response in the rehabilitation of female coronary patients aged greater than or equal to 62 years.

Authors:  P A Ades; M L Waldmann; D M Polk; J T Coflesky
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Patient's sex does not affect use of thrombolysis.

Authors:  R Raine; T Crayford; J Chambers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-31

4.  Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography, coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting: the ACRE study. Appropriateness of Coronary Revascularisation study.

Authors:  H Hemingway; A M Crook; J R Dawson; J Edelman; S Edmondson; G Feder; P Kopelman; E Leatham; P Magee; L Parsons; A D Timmis; A Wood
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1999-12

5.  Prognostic value of angiographic indices of coronary artery disease from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).

Authors:  I Ringqvist; L D Fisher; M Mock; K B Davis; H Wedel; B R Chaitman; E Passamani; R O Russell; E L Alderman; N T Kouchoukas; G C Kaiser; T J Ryan; T Killip; D Fray
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 6.  Coronary heart disease: an older woman's major health risk.

Authors:  N K Wenger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-10-25

7.  Selective cine coronary arteriography. Correlation with clinical findings in 1,000 patients.

Authors:  W L Proudfit; E K Shirey; F M Sones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  A national Survey of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Ischaemia (SAMII) in the U.K.: characteristics, management and in-hospital outcome in women compared to men in patients under 70 years.

Authors:  T J Bowker; R M Turner; D A Wood; T L Roberts; N Curzen; M Gandhi; S G Thompson; K M Fox
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 9.  Does gender bias exist in the use of specialist health care?

Authors:  R Raine
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2000-10

10.  Coronary artery surgery: are women discriminated against?

Authors:  M Petticrew; M McKee; J Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-01
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Examining sex and gender disparities in total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wendy M Novicoff; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Influence of age and gender on quality-of-life outcomes after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Quintana; I Arostegui; V Oribe; I López de Tejada; B Barrios; I Garay
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Gender differences in management and outcome in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Joakim Alfredsson; Ulf Stenestrand; Lars Wallentin; Eva Swahn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Gender and Age Differences in Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Su-Kiat Chua; Kou-Gi Shyu; Huei-Fong Hung; Jun-Jack Cheng; Huey-Ming Lo; Shih-Chi Liu; Lung-Ching Chen; Chiung-Zuan Chiu; Che-Ming Chang; Shen-Chang Lin; Jer-Young Liou; Shih-Huang Lee
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.672

5.  Gender differences in the surgical management and early clinical outcome of coronary artery disease: Single centre experience.

Authors:  Munir Ahmad; Ahmed A Arifi; Rawdené van Onselen; Ahmed A Alkodami; Muayed Zaibag; Abdul Aziz A Khaldi; Hani K Najm
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2010-02-24

6.  Gender disparity in cardiac procedures and medication use for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  John T Nguyen; Alan K Berger; Sue Duval; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 7.  Gender differences in cardiovascular disease and comorbid depression.

Authors:  Anne Maria Möller-Leimkühler
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.986

8.  Sex differences in use of interventional cardiology persist after risk adjustment.

Authors:  N Nante; G Messina; M Cecchini; O Bertetto; F Moirano; M McKee
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Gender differences in the clinical management of patients with angina pectoris: a cross-sectional survey in primary care.

Authors:  Mike Crilly; Peter Bundred; Xiyuan Hu; Lisa Leckey; Fiona Johnstone
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Women with coronary artery disease report worse health-related quality of life outcomes compared to men.

Authors:  Colleen M Norris; William A Ghali; P Diane Galbraith; Michelle M Graham; Louise A Jensen; Merril L Knudtson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.