Literature DB >> 3343930

Relationship between trabecular vertebral body density and fractures: a quantitative definition of spinal osteoporosis.

C V Odvina1, J E Wergedal, C R Libanati, E E Schulz, D J Baylink.   

Abstract

To evaluate the relationship between vertebral fractures and trabecular vertebral body density (TVBD), as measured by computed tomography (CT), we evaluated 110 female and 38 male patients referred consecutively to our clinic for an osteoporosis evaluation. Number of fractures per patient and TVBD was negatively correlated in both males and females (r = -.64, P less than .001 and r = -.69, P less than .001, respectively). Based on this relationship and that between percent of patients with fracture and TVBD, we devised four different approaches to calculate the fracture threshold. (1) Because the x-axis intercept of this regression line represents the TVBD value at zero fractures, this intercept can be considered the fracture threshold, which was 103 mg/cm3 for females and 132 mg/cm3 for males. (2) Breakpoint analysis of the relationship between the number of vertebral fractures per patient v TVBD gave a fracture threshold value of 98 mg/cm3 for females, but for males we were unable to compute a threshold value because of the small sample size. The percentage of patients with fractures was also negatively correlated with TVBD for males and females (r = -.98, P less than .001, and r = -.94, P less than .001, respectively). (3) the x-axis intercept of this relationship, which represents the fracture threshold, was 123 mg/cm3 for males and 101 mg/cm3 for females. (4) The fracture threshold, calculated as the mean TVBD + 2 SD for patients with fracture(s), was 120 and 92 mg/cm3 for males and females, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3343930     DOI: 10.1016/0026-0495(88)90099-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metabolism        ISSN: 0026-0495            Impact factor:   8.694


  14 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.

Authors:  F W Lafferty; D Y Rowland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The increase in spinal bone density that occurs in response to fluoride therapy for osteoporosis is not maintained after the therapy is discontinued.

Authors:  J R Talbot; M M Fischer; S M Farley; C Libanati; J Farley; A Tabuenca; D J Baylink
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Osteoporosis and skeletal fractures in chronic liver disease.

Authors:  T Diamond; D Stiel; M Lunzer; M Wilkinson; J Roche; S Posen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Vertebral cross-sectional area: an orphan phenotype with potential implications for female spinal health.

Authors:  T A L Wren; S Ponrartana; V Gilsanz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Interpretation of lumbar spine densitometry in women with fractures.

Authors:  S P Nielsen; F Hermansen; O Bärenholdt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Fluoride therapy for osteoporosis: a review of dose response, duration of treatment, and skeletal sites of action.

Authors:  B A Dure-Smith; M E Kraenzlin; S M Farley; C R Libanati; E E Schulz; D J Baylink
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  When bone mass fails to predict bone failure.

Authors:  S M Ott
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Vertebral size in elderly women with osteoporosis. Mechanical implications and relationship to fractures.

Authors:  V Gilsanz; M L Loro; T F Roe; J Sayre; R Gilsanz; E E Schulz
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 10.  A brief history of FRAX.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Helena Johansson; Nicholas C Harvey; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.