Literature DB >> 773744

Substrate-specific enzyme variation in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

R S Singh.   

Abstract

By using a number of different alcohols as substrates, eight alcohol dehydrogenase loci were discovered in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Each of these loci can take more than one substrate. Several of these loci differed in their tissue specificities and activity patterns during development. The genic variation in natural populations was studied at four of these loci and three of them were polymorphic. A quantitative study of substrate-specific differences among alleles of the same locus produced negative results. This result appears to be typical of most studies done on this aspect. From this it was concluded that the substrate specificity of enzymes is not an important factor in determining the greater amount of genic variation at Group II loci than at Group I loci, as proposed by KOJIMA, GILLESPIE and TOBARI (1970). There are several observations which suggest a different explanation for the differences in the genic variability at Group I and Group II loci: (1) There are, on an average, more isozyme loci (loci with similar substrate specificity) for enzymes in Group II than in Group I; (2) The null alleles are far more common at Group II loci than at Group I loci; (3) There is significant heterogeneity in the number of alleles and the heterozygosities at loci within each of these two groups of enzymes; (4) Relatively higher levels of genic variation are observed at Group II loci even in populations which appear to be living in homogeneous environments; and (5) Some loci (e.g. esterases) are highly polymorphic in most species investigated by gel electrophoresis techniques. Based on these general observations, it is proposed that (1) the substrate-specific differences are between isozyme loci and not between alleles of a given locus, and (2) neutral alleles are proportionately far more common at loci at Group II than at loci in Group I, because the former is under less selection constraint than the latter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 773744      PMCID: PMC1213471     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  16 in total

1.  Electrophoretic variation in allelozymes related to function or structure?

Authors:  E Zouros
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Population size and natural selection in the land snail Cepaea nemoralis.

Authors:  P F Brussard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Purification and characterization of two allelic forms of L-glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase from inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  L P Kozak
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 1.890

4.  Still more genetic variability in natural populations.

Authors:  S C Bernstein; L H Throckmorton; J L Hubby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Molecular heterosis for heat-sensitive enzyme alleles.

Authors:  R S Singh; J L Hubby; R C Lewontin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  How genetic background masks single-gene heterosis in Drosophila (polymorphism-selection-isoenzymes-inbreeding-fly).

Authors:  C Wills; L Nichols
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genetic variation in natural populations of Drosophila obscura.

Authors:  S Lakovaara; A Saura
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Selection acting directly on an enzyme polymorphism.

Authors:  P Morgan
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Alkaline phosphatase of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Biochemical comparison among four allelic forms.

Authors:  R A Harper; F B Armstrong
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.890

10.  Microdifferentiation in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster to alcohol in the environment.

Authors:  J A McKenzie; P A Parsons
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  8 in total

1.  The Genetic Covariance between Characters Maintained by Pleiotropic Mutations.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genic Heterogeneity at Two Alcohol Dehydrogenase Loci in DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA and DROSOPHILA PERSIMILIS.

Authors:  J A Coyne; A A Felton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A Comprehensive Study of Genic Variation in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Estimates of Heterozygosity and Patterns of Geographic Differentiation.

Authors:  R S Singh; L R Rhomberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetics of octanol and alpha-glycerophosphate dehydrogenases in the mosquito Aedes (Finlaya) togoi.

Authors:  T Tadano
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 1.890

5.  Extension of longevity in Drosophila mojavensis by environmental ethanol: differences between subraces.

Authors:  W T Starmer; W B Heed; E S Rockwood-Sluss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Alcohol-oxidizing enzymes in 13 Drosophila species.

Authors:  G K Chambers; J F McDonald; M McElfresh; F J Ayala
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.890

7.  Enzyme specificity: "pseudopolymorphism" of lactate dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A Onoufriou; S N Alahiotis
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 1.890

8.  Cytogenetic localization by variation in electrophoretic allozyme phenotype: Drosophila Odh.

Authors:  B A Clark
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 1.890

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.