Literature DB >> 17246403

A Comprehensive Study of Genic Variation in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Estimates of Heterozygosity and Patterns of Geographic Differentiation.

R S Singh1, L R Rhomberg.   

Abstract

A study of genic variation in natural population of D. melanogaster was undertaken (1) to obtain a better estimate of heterozygosity by sampling a relatively large number of gene loci and (2) to identify different groups of polymorphic loci whose variation patterns might suggest different kinds of selection forces. A total of 117 gene loci (coding for 79 enzymes and 38 abundant proteins) were studied in 15 geographically distant populations originating from different continents. The findings of this study are as follows: (1) of the 117 gene loci studied, 61 are polymorphic and 56 are uniformly monomorphic everywhere. (2) An average population is polymorphic for 43% of its gene loci and an average individual is heterozygous for 10% of its gene loci. These estimates are remarkably similar among populations. (3) The average within-locality heterozygosity (H(S)) for polymorphic loci is uniformly distributed over the range of heterozygosity observed; i.e. , given that a locus has any local variation, it is nearly as likely to have a lot as a little. (4) The distribution of F(ST) (fixation index) is strongly skewed, with a prominent mode at 8-10% and a long tail of high values reaching a maximum of 58%. Two-thirds of all loci fall within the bell-shaped distribution centered on an F(ST) of 8-10%, a result compatible with the notion that they are experiencing a common tendency toward small interlocality differences owing to extensive gene flow among populations. (5) The distribution of total heterozygosity (H(T)) has a prominent bimodal distribution. The lower mode consists of loci with single prominent allele and a few uncommon ones and the upper mode consists of clinally varying loci with a high F(ST ) (e.g., Adh and G6-pd), loci with many alleles in high frequency (e.g., Ao and Xdh) and loci with two alleles in high frequency in all populations but, with little interpopulational differentiation (e.g., Est-6 and alpha-Fuc). The loci in the lower mode are probably under purifying selection; a large proportion of those in the latter mode may be under balancing selection. (6) Comparison of genic variation for loci located inside vs. outside inversions, comparison of F(ST) for inversions and their associated genes, and comparison of F(ST) and map position for pairs of loci all suggest that, while linkage has some influence, it does not seem to constrain the pattern of variation that a locus may develop. (7) Eighteen polymorphic loci show latitudinal variation in allele frequencies which are consistent in populations from different continents. (8) Estimates of Nei genetic distance between population pairs are generally low between populations on the same continent and high between populations on different continents. There are two important exceptions: population pairs for which both localities are in the temperate zone show no relationship to distance, and in cases where both populations are tropical or subtropical, the genetic distance is higher than for the temperate-tropical comparisons and seem even higher than one would expect from the geographic distance separating them. The latter observation suggests that either geographic separation outweighs differences in environment in determining the genetic composition of a population or that all tropical populations are not experiencing the same environment.-The results are discussed in relation to the neutralist-selectionist controversy of genic variation and two important conclusions are drawn: First, there is a negative correlation between the number of loci sampled and the resulting heterozygosity. This means that available estimates of heterozygosity, 85% of which are based on 30 or fewer loci, are high and hence not appropriate for making between-taxa comparisons. Secondly, there is a group of loci, comprising one-third of polymorphic loci (or about 15% of all loci studied), that is distinguishable by different patterns of variation within and among populations. Most of these loci have clinal variation which is consistent with the hypothesis that their genetic variation is maintained by balancing selection.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 17246403      PMCID: PMC1203202     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  23 in total

1.  Letters to the editors: Lewontin-Krakauer test for neutral genes.

Authors:  M Nei; T Maruyama
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inversions fail to account for allozyme clines.

Authors:  R A Voelker; C C Cockerham; F M Johnson; H E Schaffer; T Mukai; L E Mettler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic variability maintained by mutation and overdominant selection in finite populations.

Authors:  T Maruyama; M Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Substrate-specific enzyme variation in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  R S Singh
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-03-25       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Polymorphism and the subunit structure of enzymes: a contribution to the neutralist-selectionist controversy.

Authors:  H Harris; D A Hopkinson; Y H Edwards
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Heterosis as an explanation for large amounts of genic polymorphism.

Authors:  R C Lewontin; L R Ginzburg; S D Tuljapurkar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genetic Differentiation between Geographically Distant Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  R S Singh; D A Hickey; J David
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genic variation in abundant soluble proteins of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  R S Singh; M B Coulthart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Esterase 6 and reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R C Richmond; D G Gilbert; K B Sheehan; M H Gromko; F M Butterworth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The cheetah is depauperate in genetic variation.

Authors:  S J O'brien; D E Wildt; D Goldman; C R Merril; M Bush
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  33 in total

1.  Two tests of Y chromosomal variation in male fertility of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A comprehensive study of genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Mitochondrial DNA variation and the role of history vs. selection in the genetic structure of geographic populations.

Authors:  L R Hale; R S Singh
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Bayesian variable selection for detecting adaptive genomic differences among populations.

Authors:  Andrea Riebler; Leonhard Held; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetic differentiation of Drosophila melanogaster populations as assessed by two-dimensional electrophoresis.

Authors:  G S Spicer; J E Fleming
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.890

5.  The inheritance of metabolic flux: expressions for the within-sibship mean and variance given the parental genotypes.

Authors:  P J Ward
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Highly structured Asian Drosophila melanogaster populations: a new tool for hitchhiking mapping?

Authors:  Christian Schlötterer; Hannah Neumeier; Carla Sousa; Viola Nolte
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Triglyceride pools, flight and activity variation at the Gpdh locus in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas J S Merritt; Efe Sezgin; Chen-Tseh Zhu; Walter F Eanes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The rosy region of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I. Contrasting levels of naturally occurring DNA restriction map variation and divergence.

Authors:  C F Aquadro; K M Lado; W A Noon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Geographical differentiation of allozymic variability in natural Indian populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R Parkash
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.890

10.  Latitudinal allozymic variability in natural populations of Zaprionus indianus from India.

Authors:  J P Yadav; R Parkash
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.890

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.