Literature DB >> 7731366

When encoding fails: instructions, feedback, and registration without learning.

D L Hintzman1, T Curran.   

Abstract

Four experiments replicated and extended the registration-without-learning effect, in which there is little improvement in the ability to discriminate an old target (X) from a highly similar test item (Y) after the first few presentations of X, even though judgments of frequency continue to rise in an open-ended fashion. Forced-choice testing revealed the anomalous form of the learning curve for X-Y discrimination (faster and then slower than the exponential). Effects of several different learning instructions were compared, but these appeared to affect only the level of initial learning, and to do little to promote X-Y discrimination learning on later presentations. The opportunity for self-testing with feedback during study provided no benefits when responding was covert, but did when overt anticipation was required. The findings are discussed in relation to the roles of bottom-up and top-down processing in memory encoding, and to the importance of error-correcting feedback in further structural learning of materials, once the materials have become familiar.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7731366     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

1.  Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: registration without learning?

Authors:  D L Hintzman; T Curran; B Oppy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  A mathematical model for simple learning.

Authors:  R R BUSH; F MOSTELLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1951-09       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The learning curve in relation to other psychometric functions.

Authors:  E CULLER; E GIRDEN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1951-07

4.  Voluntary attention and the spacing effect.

Authors:  D L Hintzman; J J Summers; N T Eki; M D Moore
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-09

5.  Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds.

Authors:  W A Johnston; K J Hawley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

6.  An evaluation of the total similarity principle: effects of similarity on frequency judgments.

Authors:  C M Jones; E Heit
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Incidental learning of event frequency.

Authors:  R L Greene
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-01

8.  The processing of frequency of occurrence information by adults.

Authors:  M Attig; L Hasher
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1980-01

9.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

10.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.

Authors:  G Gillund; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  14 in total

1.  Recollection-based recognition eliminates the revelation effect in memory.

Authors:  D L Westerman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  T Curran
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

3.  Memory for detail in item versus associative recognition.

Authors:  A M Cleary; T Curran; R L Greene
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

4.  Memory for unidentified items: evidence for the use of letter information in familiarity processes.

Authors:  A M Cleary; R L Greene
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

5.  The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Thomas O Nelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

6.  Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: repetition and recursive reminding.

Authors:  Douglas L Hintzman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

7.  Effects of repetition and response deadline on associative recognition in young and older adults.

Authors:  Leah L Light; Meredith M Patterson; Christie Chung; Michael R Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

8.  The effects of word frequency and similarity on recognition judgments: the role of recollection.

Authors:  Heekyeong Park; Lynne M Reder; Daniel Dickison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Are first impressions lasting impressions? An exploration of the generality of the primacy effect in memory for repetitions.

Authors:  Jeremy K Miller; Deanne L Westerman; Marianne E Lloyd
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

10.  Effects of repetition and response deadline on item recognition in young and older adults.

Authors:  Leah L Light; Christie Chung; Regina Pendergrass; Jeffrey C Van Ocker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.