Literature DB >> 15900924

Are first impressions lasting impressions? An exploration of the generality of the primacy effect in memory for repetitions.

Jeremy K Miller1, Deanne L Westerman, Marianne E Lloyd.   

Abstract

In five experiments, we investigated the primacy effect in memory for repetitions (DiGirolamo & Hintzman, 1997), the finding that when participants are shown a study list that contains two very similar versions of the same stimulus, memory is biased in the direction of the version that was presented first. In the experiments reported, the generality of the effect was examined by manipulating the orientation and features of the repeated stimuli. The results confirmed that the effect is reliable when stimulus changes affect the accidental properties of the stimulus (properties of the stimulus that give information about distance or angle but do little to aid in identification). However, the effect was not found when changes were made to other aspects of the stimulus. The results suggest that the primacy effect in memory for repetitions is not robust across all stimulus changes and converge with previous findings that have demonstrated that such properties of stimuli as orientation and size are represented differently in memory than are other stimulus characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15900924     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception.

Authors:  R R Althoff; N J Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: registration without learning?

Authors:  D L Hintzman; T Curran; B Oppy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: effects of size and reflection.

Authors:  L A Cooper; D L Schacter; S Ballesteros; C Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study.

Authors:  J Dunlosky; K W Thiede
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1998-03

5.  Representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory.

Authors:  K Srinivas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions.

Authors:  D L Schacter; L A Cooper; S M Delaney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-03

7.  Remembering left-right orientation of pictures.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; M A Gernsbacher; R E Till
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The perception of disoriented figures.

Authors:  I Rock
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.142

9.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

10.  Memory for centrally attended changing objects in an incidental real-world change detection paradigm.

Authors:  Daniel T Levin; Daniel J Simons; Bonnie L Angelone; Christopher F Chabris
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2002-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Listening to birdsong reveals basic features of rate perception and aesthetic judgements.

Authors:  Tina Roeske; Pauline Larrouy-Maestri; Yasuhiro Sakamoto; David Poeppel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Adaptation effects of highly familiar faces: immediate and long lasting.

Authors:  Claus-Christian Carbon; Tilo Strobach; Stephen R H Langton; Géza Harsányi; Helmut Leder; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.