Literature DB >> 7730196

Microbial attachment and feed digestion in the rumen.

T A McAllister1, H D Bae, G A Jones, K J Cheng.   

Abstract

Direct microscopic examination of the rumen and its contents shows microbial populations largely attached to feed particles in the digesta. Most feeds contain a surface layer that is resistant to attachment and therefore to digestion. Infiltration of these recalcitrant epidermal layers through damage sites or through focused enzymatic attack is essential for initiation of the digestive process. Proliferation of primary colonizing cells produces glycocalyx-enclosed microcolonies. Secondary colonizers from the ruminal fluid associate with microcolonies, resulting in the formation of multispecies microbial biofilms. These metabolically related organisms associate with their preferred substrates and produce the myriad of enzymes necessary for the digestion of chemically and structurally complex plant tissues. Upon accessing the internal, enzyme-susceptible tissues, microbial "digestive consortia" attach to a variety of nutrients, including protein, cellulose, and starch and digest insoluble feed materials from the inside out. Substances that prevent microbial attachment or promote detachment (e.g., condensed tannins, methylcellulose) can completely inhibit cellulose digestion. As the microbial consortium matures and adapts to a particular type of feed, it becomes inherently stable and its participant microorganisms are notoriously difficult to manipulate due to the impenetrable nature of biofilms. Properties of feed that place constraints on microbial attachment and biofilm formation can have a profound effect on both the rate and extent of feed digestion in the rumen. Developments in feed processing (i.e., chemical and physical), plant breeding, and genetic engineering (both of ruminal microorganisms and plants) that overcome these constraints through the promotion of microbial attachment and biofilm formation could substantially benefit ruminant production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7730196     DOI: 10.2527/1994.72113004x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  69 in total

1.  PCR-DGGE analysis of bacterial population attached to the bovine rumen wall.

Authors:  F Lukás; J Simůnek; J Mrázek; J Kopecný
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Natural intoxication caused by protodioscin in lambs kept in Brachiaria pastures.

Authors:  Marlova Cristina Mioto da Costa; Luís Carlos Vinhas Ítavo; Camila Celeste Brandão Ferreira Ítavo; Alexandre Menezes Dias; Gelson Dos Santos Difante; Rafael Henrique de Tonissi Buschinelli de Goes; Eduardo de Souza Leal; Lucimara Modesto Nonato; Noemila Débora Kozerski; Gabriella Jorgetti de Moraes; Marcus Vinicius Garcia Niwa; Antonio Leandro Chaves Gurgel; Thais Fernanda Farias de Souza Arco
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 3.  Harnessing nature's toolbox: regulatory elements for synthetic biology.

Authors:  Patrick M Boyle; Pamela A Silver
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Impact of subacute ruminal acidosis on the diversity of liquid and solid-associated bacteria in the rumen of goats.

Authors:  Wenjie Huo; Weiyun Zhu; Shengyong Mao
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Partial or total replacement of commercial concentrate with on-farm-grown mulberry forage: effects on lamb growth and feeding costs.

Authors:  A Alpízar-Naranjo; J Arece-García; M Esperance; Y López; M Molina; E González-García
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  Estimates of diet selection in cattle grazing cornstalk residues by measurement of chemical composition and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy of diet samples collected by ruminal evacuation.

Authors:  Emily A Petzel; Alexander J Smart; Benoit St-Pierre; Susan L Selman; Eric A Bailey; Erin E Beck; Julie A Walker; Cody L Wright; Jeffrey E Held; Derek W Brake
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Parts plus pipes: synthetic biology approaches to metabolic engineering.

Authors:  Patrick M Boyle; Pamela A Silver
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 9.783

8.  RUMINANT NUTRITION SYMPOSIUM: Tiny but mighty: the role of the rumen microbes in livestock production.

Authors:  Kristi M Cammack; Kathleen J Austin; William R Lamberson; Gavin C Conant; Hannah C Cunningham
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Quantitative qPCR Analysis of Ruminal Microorganisms in Beef Cattle Grazing in Pastures in the Rainy Season and Supplemented with Different Protein Levels.

Authors:  Renata Pereira da Silva-Marques; Joanis Tilemahos Zervoudakis; Luciano Nakazato; Luciano da Silva Cabral; Luciana Keiko Hatamoto-Zervoudakis; Maria Isabel Leite da Silva; Núbia Bezerra do Nascimento Matos; Letícia Camara Pitchenin
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.188

10.  Effect of engineered biocarbon on rumen fermentation, microbial protein synthesis, and methane production in an artificial rumen (RUSITEC) fed a high forage diet.

Authors:  Atef M Saleem; Gabriel O Ribeiro; Wenzhu Z Yang; Tao Ran; Karen A Beauchemin; Emma J McGeough; Kim H Ominski; Erasmus K Okine; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.