Literature DB >> 21743973

Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Kim Dao Ly1, Ashok Agarwal, Zsolt Peter Nagy.   

Abstract

Despite an ongoing debate over its efficacy, preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is increasingly being used to detect numerical chromosomal abnormalities in embryos to improve implantation rates after IVF. The main indications for the use of PGS in IVF treatments include advanced maternal age, repeated implantation failure, and recurrent pregnancy loss. The success of PGS is highly dependent on technical competence, embryo culture quality, and the presence of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos. Today, cleavage stage biopsy is the most commonly used method for screening preimplantation embryos for aneuploidy. However, blastocyst biopsy is rapidly becoming the more preferred method due to a decreased likelihood of mosaicism and an increase in the amount of DNA available for testing. Instead of using 9 to 12 chromosome FISH, a 24 chromosome detection by aCGH or SNP microarray will be used. Thus, it is advised that before attempting to perform PGS and expecting any benefit, extended embryo culture towards day 5/6 should be established and proven and the clinical staff should demonstrate competence with routine competency assessments. A properly designed randomized control trial is needed to test the potential benefits of these new developments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21743973      PMCID: PMC3169679          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-011-9608-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  167 in total

1.  Identification of differentially expressed mRNAs in bovine preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  J Kanka; A Bryova; V Duranthon; J F Oudin; N Peynot; J P Renard
Journal:  Zygote       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.442

2.  Does PGD for aneuploidy screening change the selection of embryos derived from testicular sperm extraction in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermic men?

Authors:  P Donoso; P Platteau; E G Papanikolaou; C Staessen; A Van Steirteghem; P Devroey
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  The importance of good practice in preimplantation genetic screening: critical viewpoints.

Authors:  Carmen Rubio; Carles Giménez; Esther Fernández; Xavi Vendrell; Esther Velilla; Mónica Parriego; Lorena Rodrigo
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  William B Schoolcraft; Elpida Fragouli; John Stevens; Santiago Munne; Mandy G Katz-Jaffe; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  An estimate of the cost of in vitro fertilization services in the United States in 1995.

Authors:  J A Collins; M Bustillo; R D Visscher; L D Lawrence
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis reduces pregnancy loss in women aged 35 years and older with a history of recurrent miscarriages.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Serena Chen; Jill Fischer; Pere Colls; Xuezong Zheng; John Stevens; Tomas Escudero; Maria Oter; Bill Schoolcraft; Joe Leigh Simpson; Jacques Cohen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Self-correction of chromosomally abnormal embryos in culture and implications for stem cell production.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Esther Velilla; Pere Colls; Mercedez Garcia Bermudez; Mohan C Vemuri; Nury Steuerwald; John Garrisi; Jacques Cohen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Assessment of numeric abnormalities of X, Y, 18, and 16 chromosomes in preimplantation human embryos before transfer.

Authors:  S Munné; K M Sultan; H U Weier; J A Grifo; J Cohen; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Chromosome abnormalities in 1255 cleavage-stage human embryos.

Authors:  C Márquez; M Sandalinas; M Bahçe; M Alikani; S Munné
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for organization of a PGD centre for PGD/preimplantation genetic screening.

Authors:  G Harton; P Braude; A Lashwood; A Schmutzler; J Traeger-Synodinos; L Wilton; J C Harper
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The state of "freeze-for-all" in human ARTs.

Authors:  Natalia Basile; Juan A Garcia-Velasco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetics and other reproductive options in Huntington disease.

Authors:  Jan K Blancato; Erin M Wolfe; Preston C Sacks
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2017

Review 3.  A review of, and commentary on, the ongoing second clinical introduction of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) to routine IVF practice.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; David H Barad
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Application of microfluidic technologies to human assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Gary D Smith; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Do patients who achieve pregnancy using IVF-PGS do the recommended genetic diagnostic testing in pregnancy?

Authors:  Dana Kimelman; Rafael Confino; Edmond Confino; Lee P Shulman; John X Zhang; Mary Ellen Pavone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Zhihong Yang; Jiaen Liu; Gary S Collins; Shala A Salem; Xiaohong Liu; Sarah S Lyle; Alison C Peck; E Scott Sills; Rifaat D Salem
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Challenges of Genetic Screening of In Vitro Fertilized Human Embryos Using Current Technologies.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Sadeghi
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

8.  Comprehensive chromosome analysis of blastocysts before implantation using array CGH.

Authors:  Mi Kyung Chung; Sang-Jin Park; Hyeon Jeong Jeong; Jung Hyun Lee; Hee-Doo Chung; Ho-Young Kang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study.

Authors:  Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Antonio Capalbo; Silvia Colamaria; Susanna Ferrero; Roberta Maggiulli; Gábor Vajta; Fabio Sapienza; Danilo Cimadomo; Maddalena Giuliani; Enrica Gravotta; Alberto Vaiarelli; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Successful birth of South India's first twins after preimplantation genetic screening of embryos.

Authors:  Priya Selvaraj; Kamala Selvaraj; Kalaichelvi Srinivasan; Mahalakshmi Sivakumar
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.