Literature DB >> 7716616

Comparative anatomy of the baboon and the human cervical spine.

T Tominaga1, C A Dickman, V K Sonntag, S Coons.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The anatomy of baboon and human cervical spines were compared by measuring adult, cadaveric specimens.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare human and baboon cervical motion segments to determine whether the baboon provides a suitable model for spinal research. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies have examined the quantitative anatomy of the human cervical bones and ligaments. Several animal species have been used for cervical spine research; however, no studies have validated whether the animal models resemble the human cervical spine closely enough to provide generalizable data.
METHODS: Multiple morphologic parameters were measured directly from nine baboon and six human adult cadaveric cervical spine specimens. The bone structure and geometry of each of the seven cervical vertebrae were analyzed; the structure and histology of the ligaments were measured; and histomorphometry of the vertebrae was performed.
RESULTS: The architectural composition and geometry of individual cervical vertebrae of baboons and humans were similar at each level. The proportional relationship of bone and ligament structures in the two species was almost identical. There were, however, several differences: 1) The baboon spine was about half the size of the human spine; 2) its vertebral arteries were encased fully within the C1 lateral mass; 3) its uncovertebral joints were more prominent; 4) its vertebral endplates were more concave; 5) its pedicles were thinner; 6) its transverse processes were longer; and 7) its spinous processes were horizontal and nonbifid.
CONCLUSIONS: The geometry and anatomy of the baboon cervical spine closely resemble that of the human cervical spine. It therefore provides an excellent model for in vivo and in vitro research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7716616     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199501150-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

Review 1.  Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sun-Ren Sheng; Xiang-Yang Wang; Hua-Zi Xu; Guo-Qing Zhu; Yi-Fei Zhou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Thoracic spine morphology of a pseudo-biped animal model (kangaroo) and comparisons with human and quadruped animals.

Authors:  Sriram Balasubramanian; James R Peters; Lucy F Robinson; Anita Singh; Richard W Kent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Morphological characteristics of the kangaroo lumbar intervertebral discs and comparison with other animal models used in spine research.

Authors:  Uphar Chamoli; Jose Umali; Meike W A Kleuskens; Daniel Chepurin; Ashish D Diwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Morphometrical dimensions of the sheep thoracolumbar vertebrae as seen on digitised CT images.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mageed; Dagmar Berner; Henriette Jülke; Christian Hohaus; Walter Brehm; Kerstin Gerlach
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2013-09-27

5.  Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans.

Authors:  Sun-Ren Sheng; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Li Wang; Qing-An Zhu; Fang-Min Mao; Yan Lin; Xiang-Yang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of the anatomical morphology of cervical vertebrae between humans and macaques: related to a spinal cord injury model.

Authors:  Junhao Liu; Zhou Yang; Xiuhua Wu; Zucheng Huang; Zhiping Huang; Xushi Chen; Qi Liu; Hui Jiang; Qingan Zhu
Journal:  Exp Anim       Date:  2020-10-16

7.  Artificial cervical vertebra and intervertebral complex replacement through the anterior approach in animal model: a biomechanical and in vivo evaluation of a successful goat model.

Authors:  Jie Qin; Xijing He; Dong Wang; Peng Qi; Lei Guo; Sihua Huang; Xuan Cai; Haopeng Li; Rui Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Biomechanical analysis of the camelid cervical intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Dean K Stolworthy; R Amy Fullwood; Tyler M Merrell; Laura C Bridgewater; Anton E Bowden
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.