Uphar Chamoli1,2, Jose Umali3, Meike W A Kleuskens4, Daniel Chepurin3,5, Ashish D Diwan3. 1. Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales Australia, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, 2217, Australia. u.chamoli@unsw.edu.au. 2. Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia. u.chamoli@unsw.edu.au. 3. Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales Australia, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, 2217, Australia. 4. Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 5. Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Animal models are frequently used to elucidate pathomechanism and pathophysiology of various disorders of the human intervertebral disc (IVD) and also to develop therapeutic approaches. Here we report morphological characteristics of the kangaroo lumbar IVDs and compare them with other animal models used in spine research. METHODS: Twenty-five fresh-frozen cadaveric lumbar spines (T12-S1) derived from kangaroo carcases (Macropus giganteus) of undetermined age were first scanned in a C-Arm X-ray machine. A photograph of the axial section of the disc including a calibrated metric scale was also acquired. The digital radiographs and photographs were processed in ImageJ to determine the axial and sagittal plane dimensions for the whole disc (WD) and the nucleus pulposus (NP) and the mid-sagittal disc height for all the lumbar levels. RESULTS: Our results suggest that the L6-S1 IVD in kangaroos is distinctly large compared with the upper lumbar IVDs. Based on previously published data, human lumbar IVDs are the largest of all the animal IVDs used in spine research, with camelid cervical IVDs being the closest relative in absolute dimensions (llamas: 78% in disc height, 40% in WD volume, and 38% in NP volume). Kangaroo L6-S1 IVD was approximately 51% in height, 20% in WD volume, and 20% in NP volume of the human lumbar IVD. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that morphological similarities exist between a kangaroo and human lumbar IVD, especially with the lima bean shape in the axial plane, wedge shape in the sagittal plane, convexity at the cephalad endplates, and percentage volume occupied by the NP in the IVD. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
PURPOSE: Animal models are frequently used to elucidate pathomechanism and pathophysiology of various disorders of the human intervertebral disc (IVD) and also to develop therapeutic approaches. Here we report morphological characteristics of the kangaroo lumbar IVDs and compare them with other animal models used in spine research. METHODS: Twenty-five fresh-frozen cadaveric lumbar spines (T12-S1) derived from kangaroo carcases (Macropus giganteus) of undetermined age were first scanned in a C-Arm X-ray machine. A photograph of the axial section of the disc including a calibrated metric scale was also acquired. The digital radiographs and photographs were processed in ImageJ to determine the axial and sagittal plane dimensions for the whole disc (WD) and the nucleus pulposus (NP) and the mid-sagittal disc height for all the lumbar levels. RESULTS: Our results suggest that the L6-S1 IVD in kangaroos is distinctly large compared with the upper lumbar IVDs. Based on previously published data, human lumbar IVDs are the largest of all the animal IVDs used in spine research, with camelid cervical IVDs being the closest relative in absolute dimensions (llamas: 78% in disc height, 40% in WD volume, and 38% in NP volume). Kangaroo L6-S1 IVD was approximately 51% in height, 20% in WD volume, and 20% in NP volume of the human lumbar IVD. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that morphological similarities exist between a kangaroo and human lumbar IVD, especially with the lima bean shape in the axial plane, wedge shape in the sagittal plane, convexity at the cephalad endplates, and percentage volume occupied by the NP in the IVD. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Authors: Uphar Chamoli; Mert H Korkusuz; Ashutosh B Sabnis; Andrei R Manolescu; Naomi Tsafnat; Ashish D Diwan Journal: Proc Inst Mech Eng H Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 1.617
Authors: Dean K Stolworthy; Anton E Bowden; Beverly L Roeder; Todd F Robinson; Jacob G Holland; S Loyd Christensen; Amanda M Beatty; Laura C Bridgewater; Dennis L Eggett; John D Wendel; Susanne M Stieger-Vanegas; Meredith D Taylor Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Brent L Showalter; Jesse C Beckstein; John T Martin; Elizabeth E Beattie; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Thomas P Schaer; Edward J Vresilovic; Dawn M Elliott Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-07-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Jesse C Beckstein; Sounok Sen; Thomas P Schaer; Edward J Vresilovic; Dawn M Elliott Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-03-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Mauro Alini; Stephen M Eisenstein; Keita Ito; Christopher Little; A Annette Kettler; Koichi Masuda; James Melrose; Jim Ralphs; Ian Stokes; Hans Joachim Wilke Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2007-07-14 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Alexandra Alcántara Guardado; Alexander Baker; Andrew Weightman; Judith A Hoyland; Glen Cooper Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Date: 2022-01-19