Literature DB >> 7704110

Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: avoiding a trade-off.

R C O'Reilly1, J L McClelland.   

Abstract

The hippocampus and related structures are thought to be capable of 1) representing cortical activity in a way that minimizes overlap of the representations assigned to different cortical patterns (pattern separation); and 2) modifying synaptic connections so that these representations can later be reinstated from partial or noisy versions of the cortical activity pattern that was present at the time of storage (pattern completion). We point out that there is a trade-off between pattern separation and completion and propose that the unique anatomical and physiological properties of the hippocampus might serve to minimize this trade-off. We use analytical methods to determine quantitative estimates of both separation and completion for specified parameterized models of the hippocampus. These estimates are then used to evaluate the role of various properties and of the hippocampus, such as the activity levels seen in different hippocampal regions, synaptic potentiation and depression, the multi-layer connectivity of the system, and the relatively focused and strong mossy fiber projections. This analysis is focused on the feedforward pathways from the entorhinal cortex (EC) to the dentate gyrus (DG) and region CA3. Among our results are the following: 1) Hebbian synaptic modification (LTP) facilitates completion but reduces separation, unless the strengths of synapses from inactive presynaptic units to active postsynaptic units are reduced (LTD). 2) Multiple layers, as in EC to DG to CA3, allow the compounding of pattern separation, but not pattern completion. 3) The variance of the input signal carried by the mossy fibers is important for separation, not the raw strength, which may explain why the mossy fiber inputs are few and relatively strong, rather than many and relatively weak like the other hippocampal pathways. 4) The EC projects to CA3 both directly and indirectly via the DG, which suggests that the two-stage pathway may dominate during pattern separation and the one-stage pathway may dominate during completion; methods the hippocampus may use to enhance this effect are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7704110     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.450040605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  277 in total

1.  The involvement of recurrent connections in area CA3 in establishing the properties of place fields: a model.

Authors:  S Káli; P Dayan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Conjunctive representations, the hippocampus, and contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  J W Rudy; R C O'Reilly
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: a computational model.

Authors:  M J Frank; B Loughry; R C O'Reilly
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The basis of hyperspecificity in autism: a preliminary suggestion based on properties of neural nets.

Authors:  J L McClelland
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2000-10

5.  Where is ELSA? The early to late shift in aging.

Authors:  Ilana T Z Dew; Norbou Buchler; Ian G Dobbins; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Hippocampus is required for paired associate memory with neither delay nor trial uniqueness.

Authors:  Jinah Yoon; Yeran Seo; Jangjin Kim; Inah Lee
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  The shift from a response strategy to object-in-place strategy during learning is accompanied by a matching shift in neural firing correlates in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Inah Lee; Jangjin Kim
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Dentate gyrus is necessary for disambiguating similar object-place representations.

Authors:  Inah Lee; Frances Solivan
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Attractor-map versus autoassociation based attractor dynamics in the hippocampal network.

Authors:  Laura L Colgin; Stefan Leutgeb; Karel Jezek; Jill K Leutgeb; Edvard I Moser; Bruce L McNaughton; May-Britt Moser
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in hippocampal CA3 neurons.

Authors:  S Astori; V Pawlak; G Köhr
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.