Literature DB >> 22174309

Hippocampus is required for paired associate memory with neither delay nor trial uniqueness.

Jinah Yoon1, Yeran Seo, Jangjin Kim, Inah Lee.   

Abstract

Cued retrieval of memory is typically examined with delay when testing hippocampal functions, as in delayed matching-to-sample tasks. Equally emphasized in the literature, on the other hand, is the hippocampal involvement in making arbitrary associations. Paired associate memory tasks are widely used for examining this function. However, the two variables (i.e., delay and paired association) were often mixed in paired associate tasks, and this makes it difficult to localize the cognitive source of deficits with hippocampal perturbation. Specifically, a few studies have recently shown that rats can learn arbitrary paired associations between certain locations and nonspatial items (e.g., object or flavor) and later can retrieve the paired location when cued by the item remotely. Such tasks involve both (1) delay between sampling the cue and retrieving the target location and (2) arbitrary association between the cueing object and its paired location. Here, we tested whether delay was necessary in a cued paired associate task by using a task in which no delay existed between object cueing and the choice of its paired associate. Moreover, fixed associative relationships between the cueing objects and their paired locations were repeatedly used, thus involving no trial-unique association. Nevertheless, inactivations of the dorsal hippocampus with muscimol severely disrupted retrieval of paired associates, whereas the same manipulations did not affect discriminating individual objects or locations. The results powerfully demonstrate that the hippocampus is inherently required for retrieving paired associations between objects and places, and that delay and trial uniqueness of the paired associates are not necessarily required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22174309      PMCID: PMC3246592          DOI: 10.1101/lm.024554.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  62 in total

1.  Role of the rodent hippocampus in paired-associate learning involving associations between a stimulus and a spatial location.

Authors:  Paul E Gilbert; Raymond P Kesner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Differential roles of dorsal hippocampal subregions in spatial working memory with short versus intermediate delay.

Authors:  Inah Lee; Raymond P Kesner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  The shift from a response strategy to object-in-place strategy during learning is accompanied by a matching shift in neural firing correlates in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Inah Lee; Jangjin Kim
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates.

Authors:  Jed A Meltzer; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Medial temporal lobe activity predicts successful relational memory binding.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Interaction of perirhinal cortex with the fornix-fimbria: memory for objects and "object-in-place" memory.

Authors:  D Gaffan; A Parker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Neural models of memory.

Authors:  M E Hasselmo; J L McClelland
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Monkeys with rhinal cortex damage or neurotoxic hippocampal lesions are impaired on spatial scene learning and object reversals.

Authors:  E A Murray; M G Baxter; D Gaffan
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Schemas and memory consolidation.

Authors:  Dorothy Tse; Rosamund F Langston; Masaki Kakeyama; Ingrid Bethus; Patrick A Spooner; Emma R Wood; Menno P Witter; Richard G M Morris
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Dentate gyrus NMDA receptors mediate rapid pattern separation in the hippocampal network.

Authors:  Thomas J McHugh; Matthew W Jones; Jennifer J Quinn; Nina Balthasar; Roberto Coppari; Joel K Elmquist; Bradford B Lowell; Michael S Fanselow; Matthew A Wilson; Susumu Tonegawa
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  12 in total

1.  Functional contributions and interactions between the human hippocampus and subregions of the striatum during arbitrary associative learning and memory.

Authors:  Aaron T Mattfeld; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Glucose, relational memory, and the hippocampus.

Authors:  Brian Stollery; Leonie Christian
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Age-related impairments on the touchscreen paired associates learning (PAL) task in male rats.

Authors:  Samantha M Smith; Sabrina Zequeira; Meena Ravi; Sarah A Johnson; Andriena M Hampton; Aleyna M Ross; Wonn Pyon; Andrew P Maurer; Jennifer L Bizon; Sara N Burke
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 5.133

4.  The critical role of sleep spindles in hippocampal-dependent memory: a pharmacology study.

Authors:  Sara C Mednick; Elizabeth A McDevitt; James K Walsh; Erin Wamsley; Martin Paulus; Jennifer C Kanady; Sean P A Drummond
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Acute Exercise Intensity and Memory Function: Evaluation of the Transient Hypofrontality Hypothesis.

Authors:  Paul D Loprinzi; Sierra Day; Raymond Deming
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Effects of Acute Normobaric Hypoxia on Memory Interference.

Authors:  Paul D Loprinzi; Aala'a Matalgah; Lindsay Crawford; Jane J Yu; Zhaowei Kong; Bo Wang; Shijie Liu; Liye Zou
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-11-14

Review 7.  Contextual behavior and neural circuits.

Authors:  Inah Lee; Choong-Hee Lee
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Perirhinal cortical inactivation impairs object-in-place memory and disrupts task-dependent firing in hippocampal CA1, but not in CA3.

Authors:  Inah Lee; Seong-Beom Park
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Influence of Proximal, Distal, and Vestibular Frames of Reference in Object-Place Paired Associate Learning in the Rat.

Authors:  Lilliana M Sanchez; Shannon M Thompson; Benjamin J Clark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Storage fidelity for sequence memory in the hippocampal circuit.

Authors:  Mehdi Bayati; Torsten Neher; Jan Melchior; Kamran Diba; Laurenz Wiskott; Sen Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.