Literature DB >> 20671146

The shift from a response strategy to object-in-place strategy during learning is accompanied by a matching shift in neural firing correlates in the hippocampus.

Inah Lee1, Jangjin Kim.   

Abstract

Hippocampal-dependent tasks often involve specific associations among stimuli (including egocentric information), and such tasks are therefore prone to interference from irrelevant task strategies before a correct strategy is found. Using an object-place paired-associate task, we investigated changes in neural firing patterns in the hippocampus in association with a shift in strategy during learning. We used an object-place paired-associate task in which a pair of objects was presented in two different arms of a radial maze. Each object was associated with reward only in one of the arms, thus requiring the rats to consider both object identity and its location in the maze. Hippocampal neurons recorded in CA1 displayed a dynamic transition in their firing patterns during the acquisition of the task across days, and this corresponded to a shift in strategy manifested in behavioral data. Specifically, before the rats learned the task, they chose an object that maintained a particular egocentric relationship with their body (response strategy) irrespective of the object identity. However, as the animal acquired the task, it chose an object according to both its identity and the associated location in the maze (object-in-place strategy). We report that CA1 neurons in the hippocampus changed their prospective firing correlates according to the dominant strategy (i.e., response versus object-in-place strategy) employed at a given stage of learning. The results suggest that neural firing pattern in the hippocampus is heavily influenced by the task demand hypothesized by the animal and the firing pattern changes flexibly as the perceived task demand changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20671146      PMCID: PMC2920752          DOI: 10.1101/lm.1829110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  47 in total

1.  Role of the rodent hippocampus in paired-associate learning involving associations between a stimulus and a spatial location.

Authors:  Paul E Gilbert; Raymond P Kesner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions.

Authors:  W B SCOVILLE; B MILNER
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1957-02       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Learning-related development of context-specific neuronal responses to places and events: the hippocampal role in context processing.

Authors:  David M Smith; Sheri J Y Mizumori
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Switching memory systems during learning: changes in patterns of brain acetylcholine release in the hippocampus and striatum in rats.

Authors:  Qing Chang; Paul E Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neuronal activity in the primate hippocampal formation during a conditional association task based on the subject's location.

Authors:  S Eifuku; H Nishijo; T Kita; T Ono
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Organization of the entorhinal-hippocampal system: a review of current anatomical data.

Authors:  M P Witter
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: avoiding a trade-off.

Authors:  R C O'Reilly; J L McClelland
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Dynamics of mismatch correction in the hippocampal ensemble code for space: interaction between path integration and environmental cues.

Authors:  K M Gothard; W E Skaggs; B L McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Interactions between location and task affect the spatial and directional firing of hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  E J Markus; Y L Qin; B Leonard; W E Skaggs; B L McNaughton; C A Barnes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Robust conjunctive item-place coding by hippocampal neurons parallels learning what happens where.

Authors:  Robert W Komorowski; Joseph R Manns; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  12 in total

1.  Hippocampus is required for paired associate memory with neither delay nor trial uniqueness.

Authors:  Jinah Yoon; Yeran Seo; Jangjin Kim; Inah Lee
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Medial prefrontal-perirhinal cortical communication is necessary for flexible response selection.

Authors:  Abbi R Hernandez; Jordan E Reasor; Leah M Truckenbrod; Katelyn N Lubke; Sarah A Johnson; Jennifer L Bizon; Andrew P Maurer; Sara N Burke
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Neural Firing Patterns Are More Schematic and Less Sensitive to Changes in Background Visual Scenes in the Subiculum than in the Hippocampus.

Authors:  Hyun-Woo Lee; Su-Min Lee; Inah Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural correlates of object-in-place learning in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Jangjin Kim; Sébastien Delcasso; Inah Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Moderate prenatal alcohol exposure impairs performance by adult male rats in an object-place paired-associate task.

Authors:  Lilliana M Sanchez; Jonathan Goss; Jennifer Wagner; Suzy Davies; Daniel D Savage; Derek A Hamilton; Benjamin J Clark
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Still searching for the engram.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  The effects of developmental alcohol exposure on the neurobiology of spatial processing.

Authors:  Ryan E Harvey; Laura E Berkowitz; Derek A Hamilton; Benjamin J Clark
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Rodent mnemonic similarity task performance requires the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Sarah A Johnson; Sabrina Zequeira; Sean M Turner; Andrew P Maurer; Jennifer L Bizon; Sara N Burke
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.753

Review 9.  Contextual behavior and neural circuits.

Authors:  Inah Lee; Choong-Hee Lee
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Perirhinal cortical inactivation impairs object-in-place memory and disrupts task-dependent firing in hippocampal CA1, but not in CA3.

Authors:  Inah Lee; Seong-Beom Park
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.