Literature DB >> 2965135

Teicoplanin compared with vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: preliminary results.

Y Van Laethem1, P Hermans, S De Wit, H Goosens, N Clumeck.   

Abstract

Twenty-one patients were included in an open randomized study comparing vancomycin 1 g bd with teicoplanin 400 mg daily in severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. The median duration of therapy was 15 days for vancomycin and 21 days for teicoplanin. Most patients presented with severe underlying conditions, such as major surgery (8), solid tumours (5), multiple trauma (3). The infections treated, included septicaemia, osteomyelitis, bronchopneumonia, cellulitis and acute pyelonephritis. Mean MICs of the strains were 0.39 mg/l for vancomycin and 0.195 mg/l for teicoplanin. Mean trough and peak serum concentrations of vancomycin were 14.3 +/- 5 mg/l and 34.3 +/- 13 mg/l, while the teicoplanin values were 7.5 +/- 4 mg/l and 17 +/- 7 mg/l. The cure rate was seven of 12 in the teicoplanin group and six of nine in the vancomycin group, with four and three cases, respectively, of improvement and one failure in the teicoplanin group. Transient renal impairment occurred in two cases with both regimens; superinfection and colonization in three patients and one patient, respectively, with both regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2965135     DOI: 10.1093/jac/21.suppl_a.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  12 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of vancomycin for the treatment of patients with gram-positive infections: focus on the study design.

Authors:  Konstantinos Z Vardakas; Michael N Mavros; Nikolaos Roussos; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Clinical efficacy of teicoplanin.

Authors:  P Calain; F Waldvogel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Teicoplanin pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis after intravenous and intraperitoneal dosing.

Authors:  D R Guay; W M Awni; C E Halstenson; M T Kenny; W F Keane; G R Matzke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuli Svetitsky; Leonard Leibovici; Mical Paul
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Teicoplanin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  D M Campoli-Richards; R N Brogden; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  The management of infection and colonization due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A CIDS/CAMM position paper.

Authors:  Andrew E Simor; Mark Loeb
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01

Review 7.  Anti-infective treatment in intensive care: the role of glycopeptides.

Authors:  R N Grüneberg; A P Wilson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Teicoplanin: a well-tolerated and easily administered alternative to vancomycin for gram-positive infections in intensive care patients.

Authors:  P Charbonneau; I Harding; J J Garaud; J Aubertin; F Brunet; Y Domart
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Teicoplanin alone or combined with rifampin compared with vancomycin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H J Schaad; C Chuard; P Vaudaux; F A Waldvogel; D P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Randomized study of vancomycin versus teicoplanin for the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections in immunocompromised hosts.

Authors:  P Van der Auwera; M Aoun; F Meunier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.