Literature DB >> 2778072

Enterococci highly resistant to penicillin and ampicillin: an emerging clinical problem?

F L Sapico1, H N Canawati, V J Ginunas, D S Gilmore, J Z Montgomerie, W J Tuddenham, R R Facklam.   

Abstract

Sixteen clinical isolates of ampicillin-resistant enterococci (ARE) were recovered from the microbiology laboratory of a 450-bed rehabilitation medical center from January 1981 to September 1987. These isolates were detected when a disk diffusion test using 10 micrograms of ampicillin on a blood agar plate revealed no zones of inhibition. Tube macrodilution tests yielded an MIC of greater than or equal to 16 micrograms of ampicillin per ml. None of the isolates were penicillinase producers by the chromogenic cephalosporin disk test. Ten isolates were Enterococcus faecium, four isolates were E. raffinosus, one isolate was E. gallinarum, and one isolate was not identified (lost). There were 6 male and 10 female patients. The sources of isolates were urine (n = 7), wound (n = 5), ascitic fluid (n = 2), blood (n = 2), peritoneal catheter tip (n = 1), Bartholin's cyst abscess (n = 1), rectal swab (n = 2), and pancreatic abscess (n = 1). The organism was isolated from multiple sites in 4 patients, was a pure culture isolate in 5 patients, and was part of a polymicrobial flora in 11 patients. Six patients were diabetic, and four had liver cirrhosis. All but four patients had received at least one antibiotic within 3 weeks of ARE isolation. The MICs (micrograms per milliliter) for 50 and 90% of isolates tested, respectively, were as follows: ampicillin, 64 and 64; penicillin, 128 and greater than 128; vancomycin, 1 and 2; gentamicin, 4 and 16; ciprofloxacin, 1.6 and 3.2; imipenem, 128 and greater than 128; and daptomycin (LY146032), 1.6 and 6.4. ARE may be an emerging pathogen in the hospitalized patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2778072      PMCID: PMC267744          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.27.9.2091-2095.1989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  31 in total

1.  High-level, plasmid-borne resistance to gentamicin in Streptococcus faecalis subsp. zymogenes.

Authors:  T Horodniceanu; L Bougueleret; N El-Solh; G Bieth; F Delbos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Prevalence of high-level resistance to aminoglycosides in clinical isolates of enterococci.

Authors:  R C Moellering; C Wennersten; T Medrek; A N Weinberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda)       Date:  1970

3.  A simple, rapid test to differentiate penicillin-susceptible from penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A P Adams; A L Barry; E J Benner
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Susceptibility of group D streptococcus (enterococcus) to 21 antibiotics in vitro, with special reference to species differences.

Authors:  P Toala; A McDonald; C Wilcox; M Finland
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 2.378

5.  Antibiotic synergism of enterococci. Relation to inhibitory concentrations.

Authors:  H D Standiford; J B De Maine; W M Kirby
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1970-08

6.  Plasmid-mediated mechanisms of resistance to aminoglycoside-aminocyclitol antibiotics and to chloramphenicol in group D streptococci.

Authors:  P M Courvalin; W V Shaw; A E Jacob
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Aminoglycoside-inactivating enzymes in clinical isolates of Streptococcus faecalis. An explanation for resistance to antibiotic synergism.

Authors:  D J Krogstad; T R Korfhagen; R C Moellering; C Wennersten; M N Swartz
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Species-specific resistance to antimocrobial synergism in Streptococcus faecium and Streptococcus faecalis.

Authors:  R C Moellering; O M Korzeniowski; M A Sande; C B Wennersten
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Enterococci. Biologic and epidemiologic characteristics and in vitro susceptibility.

Authors:  D Kaye
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1982-10-25

10.  In vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK0787) against resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Serratia marcescens, and Enterococcus spp.

Authors:  W K Livingston; A M Elliott; C G Cobbs
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  New developments and concepts in antimicrobial therapy for intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Z Younes; D A Johnson
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-08

2.  Increasing resistance of enterococci to ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  D R Schaberg; W I Dillon; M S Terpenning; K A Robinson; S F Bradley; C A Kauffman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Ampicillin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  E Cercenado; M E García-Leoni; P Rodeño; M Rodríguez-Créixems
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Non-beta-lactamase-producing penicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a clinical setting.

Authors:  D Eymard; A Dascal; J Hiscott; S Gioseffini; J Stevenson; J Portnoy; J Mendelson
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1990

5.  Antibiotic resistance patterns of enterococci and occurrence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in raw minced beef and pork in Germany.

Authors:  G Klein; A Pack; G Reuter
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Evaluation of MicroScan for identification of Enterococcus species.

Authors:  D M Tritz; P C Iwen; G L Woods
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of Enterococcus raffinosus with Enterococcus avium on the basis of penicillin susceptibility, penicillin-binding protein analysis, and high-level aminoglycoside resistance.

Authors:  M L Grayson; G M Eliopoulos; C B Wennersten; K L Ruoff; K Klimm; F L Sapico; A S Bayer; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In vitro activity of decaplanin (M86-1410), a new glycopeptide antibiotic.

Authors:  M L Sanchez; R P Wenzel; R N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Teicoplanin: a well-tolerated and easily administered alternative to vancomycin for gram-positive infections in intensive care patients.

Authors:  P Charbonneau; I Harding; J J Garaud; J Aubertin; F Brunet; Y Domart
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Species identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing of enterococci isolated from hospitalized patients.

Authors:  J W Gray; D Stewart; S J Pedler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.