Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Effect of delayed specimen processing on cytomegalovirus antigenemia test results.

Literature DB >> 7699056

Effect of delayed specimen processing on cytomegalovirus antigenemia test results.

M L Landry¹, D Ferguson, S Cohen, K Huber, P Wetherill.

Abstract

Blood samples held at either 4 degrees C or room temperature for 1 day had similar mean decreases in number of cytomegalovirus antigenemia-positive cells (52 to 55%) and similar false-negative test results (13 to 14%). After 2 days, samples held at 4 degrees C showed no further decline, whereas samples held at room temperature had a mean 81% decrease in positive cells, a 32% false-negative rate, and a more marked deterioration in cell morphology.

Mesh：

Substances：

Year: 1995 PMID： 7699056 PMCID： PMC227925 DOI： 10.1128/jcm.33.1.257-259.1995

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Microbiol ISSN： 0095-1137 Impact factor: 5.948

10 in total

1. Cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay.

Authors: M van der Giessen; T H The; W J van Son
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1991-12 Impact factor: 5.948

2. Prospective study of cytomegalovirus antigenemia in allograft recipients.

Authors: H Miller; E Rossier; R Milk; C Thomas
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1991-05 Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3. Cytomegalovirus antigenemia.

Authors: T H The; W van der Bij; A P van den Berg; M van der Giessen; J Weits; H G Sprenger; W J van Son
Journal: Rev Infect Dis Date: 1990 Sep-Oct

4. The effect of various cell separation procedures on assays of neutrophil function. A critical appraisal.

Authors: L Glasser; R L Fiederlein
Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 1990-05 Impact factor: 2.493

5. Factors influencing detection of quantitative cytomegalovirus antigenemia.

Authors: M Boeckh; P M Woogerd; T Stevens-Ayers; C G Ray; R A Bowden
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 5.948

6. Effect of delayed processing of blood samples on performance of cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay.

Authors: J Niubò; J L Pérez; A Carvajal; C Ardanuy; R Martín
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1994-04 Impact factor: 5.948

7. Effects of temperature on granulocyte preservation.

Authors: J McCullough; B J Wieblen; P K Peterson; P G Quie
Journal: Blood Date: 1978-08 Impact factor: 22.113

8. Comparison of quantitative cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay with culture methods and correlation with clinical disease.

Authors: M L Landry; D Ferguson
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 5.948

9. Comparison between viremia and antigenemia for detection of cytomegalovirus in blood.

Authors: W van der Bij; J Schirm; R Torensma; W J van Son; A M Tegzess; T H The
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1988-12 Impact factor: 5.948

10. Comparison of different immunostaining techniques and monoclonal antibodies to the lower matrix phosphoprotein (pp65) for optimal quantitation of human cytomegalovirus antigenemia.

Authors: G Gerna; M G Revello; E Percivalle; F Morini
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1992-05 Impact factor: 5.948

10 in total

15 in total

1. Use of molecular assays in diagnosis and monitoring of cytomegalovirus disease following renal transplantation.

Authors: C Aitken; W Barrett-Muir; C Millar; K Templeton; J Thomas; F Sheridan; D Jeffries; M Yaqoob; J Breuer
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 5.948

2. Comparison of PCR, antigenemia assay, and rapid blood culture for detection and prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after lung transplantation.

Authors: A Weinberg; T N Hodges; S Li; G Cai; M R Zamora
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 5.948

3. A multisite trial comparing two cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia test kits, biotest CMV brite and Bartels/Argene CMV antigenemia.

Authors: K St George; M J Boyd; S M Lipson; D Ferguson; G F Cartmell; L H Falk; C R Rinaldo; M L Landry
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 5.948

4. Comparison of LightCycler-based PCR, COBAS amplicor CMV monitor, and pp65 antigenemia assays for quantitative measurement of cytomegalovirus viral load in peripheral blood specimens from patients after solid organ transplantation.

Authors: Xiaoli L Pang; Linda Chui; Jayne Fenton; Barbara LeBlanc; Jutta K Preiksaitis
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.948

5. Evaluation of the AMPLICOR cytomegalovirus test with specimens from human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects.

Authors: G Boivin; J Handfield; E Toma; G Murray; R Lalonde; V J Tevere; R Sun; M G Bergeron
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 5.948

6. Evaluation of a leukocyte stabilization reagent for use in the cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia assay.

Authors: C E Bush; J A Sluchak-Carlsen
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 5.948

7. Evaluation of CMV Brite kit for detection of cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia in peripheral blood leukocytes by immunofluorescence.

Authors: M L Landry; D Ferguson; T Stevens-Ayers; M W de Jonge; M Boeckh
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1996-05 Impact factor: 5.948

8. Comparison of culture and the antigenemia assay for detection of cytomegalovirus in blood specimens submitted to a reference laboratory.

Authors: B G Brumback; S N Bolejack; M V Morris; C Mohla; T E Shutzbank
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 5.948

9. Novel DNA assay for cytomegalovirus detection: comparison with conventional culture and pp65 antigenemia assay.

Authors: N Veal; C Payan; D Fray; L Sarol; O Blanchet; S Kouyoumdjian; F Lunel
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1996-12 Impact factor: 5.948

10. Evaluation of the murex hybrid capture cytomegalovirus DNA assay versus plasma PCR and shell vial assay for diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus viremia in immunocompromised patients.

Authors: W Y Barrett-Muir; C Aitken; K Templeton; M Raftery; S M Kelsey; J Breuer
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 5.948