Literature DB >> 8263166

Comparison of quantitative cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay with culture methods and correlation with clinical disease.

M L Landry1, D Ferguson.   

Abstract

Blood samples, obtained predominantly from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients and solid-organ and bone marrow transplant recipients, were submitted to the clinical laboratory for detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and were processed by three methods: conventional culture, centrifugation culture, and CMV antigenemia assay with monoclonal antibodies (Clonab CMV; Biotest Diagnostic Corporation, Denville, N.J.) to CMV antigens. Of 496 blood samples tested, 107 were positive by one or more methods: 56 were positive by conventional culture, 27 were positive by centrifugation culture, and 97 were positive for CMV antigen (Ag) by the antigenemia assay. Forty-seven samples were positive by the CMV antigenemia assay only; in these samples, a mean of 12 Ag-positive cells was detected per 200,000 polymorphonuclear leukocytes examined. In contrast, samples positive by the CMV antigenemia assay and both culture methods had a mean of 193 Ag-positive cells, and samples positive by the CMV antigenemia assay and conventional culture alone had a mean of 157 Ag-positive cells. In the antigenemia assay, paraformaldehyde fixation resulted in superior cell morphology when compared with acetone fixation. Use of immunofluorescence staining reduced sample processing time and the complexity of reagent preparation in comparison with immunoperoxidase staining. Differences in the sensitivities between the immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase staining techniques for detection of antigenemia were minor, with discrepant samples showing only one or two Ag-positive cells. Clinical disease was generally associated with high-level antigenemia, but exceptions were noted. The CMV antigenemia test is a rapid, quantitative assay that greatly facilitated the rapid diagnosis of CMV infection. However, quantitation of antigenemia is labor-intensive, requires processing of samples soon after collection, and does not always correlate with clinical disease in the individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8263166      PMCID: PMC266143          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.2851-2856.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  14 in total

1.  Detection of human cytomegalovirus in clinical specimens by centrifugation culture with a nonhuman cell line.

Authors:  C A Gleaves; D A Hursh; J D Meyers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay.

Authors:  M van der Giessen; T H The; W J van Son
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of conventional and shell vial cultures for detecting cytomegalovirus infection.

Authors:  N Rabella; W L Drew
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of number of shell vial cell cultures per clinical specimen for rapid diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection.

Authors:  C V Paya; A D Wold; D M Ilstrup; T F Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Human cytomegalovirus viraemia in HIV-1-seropositive patients at various clinical stages of infection.

Authors:  G Gerna; M Parea; E Percivalle; D Zipeto; E Silini; G Barbarini; G Milanesi
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.177

6.  Detection of cytomegalovirus in peripheral leukocytes by different methods.

Authors:  W Wunderli; M K Kägi; E Grüter; J D Auracher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay is more sensitive than shell vial cultures for rapid detection of CMV in polymorphonuclear blood leukocytes.

Authors:  A Erice; M A Holm; P C Gill; S Henry; C L Dirksen; D L Dunn; R P Hillam; H H Balfour
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison between viremia and antigenemia for detection of cytomegalovirus in blood.

Authors:  W van der Bij; J Schirm; R Torensma; W J van Son; A M Tegzess; T H The
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rapid immunodiagnosis of active cytomegalovirus infection by monoclonal antibody staining of blood leucocytes.

Authors:  W van der Bij; R Torensma; W J van Son; J Anema; J Schirm; A M Tegzess; T H The
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.327

10.  Comparison of different immunostaining techniques and monoclonal antibodies to the lower matrix phosphoprotein (pp65) for optimal quantitation of human cytomegalovirus antigenemia.

Authors:  G Gerna; M G Revello; E Percivalle; F Morini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  31 in total

1.  Leukocyte stabilization reagent for use in the cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia assay.

Authors:  S M Lipson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A multisite trial comparing two cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia test kits, biotest CMV brite and Bartels/Argene CMV antigenemia.

Authors:  K St George; M J Boyd; S M Lipson; D Ferguson; G F Cartmell; L H Falk; C R Rinaldo; M L Landry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  2-Hour cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia assay for rapid quantitation of cytomegalovirus in blood samples.

Authors:  M L Landry; D Ferguson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Reduced ability to culture cytomegalovirus from peripheral blood leukocytes isolated by direct erythrocyte lysis.

Authors:  M L Landry; D Ferguson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of quantitative cytomegalovirus (CMV) PCR in plasma and CMV antigenemia assay: clinical utility of the prototype AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR test in transplant recipients.

Authors:  A M Caliendo; K St George; S Y Kao; J Allega; B H Tan; R LaFontaine; L Bui; C R Rinaldo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Effect of delayed specimen processing on cytomegalovirus antigenemia test results.

Authors:  M L Landry; D Ferguson; S Cohen; K Huber; P Wetherill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of CMV Brite kit for detection of cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia in peripheral blood leukocytes by immunofluorescence.

Authors:  M L Landry; D Ferguson; T Stevens-Ayers; M W de Jonge; M Boeckh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of culture and the antigenemia assay for detection of cytomegalovirus in blood specimens submitted to a reference laboratory.

Authors:  B G Brumback; S N Bolejack; M V Morris; C Mohla; T E Shutzbank
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Clinical significance of cytomegalovirus infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Elena Garrido; Elisa Carrera; Rebeca Manzano; Antonio Lopez-Sanroman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Clinical utility of viral load in management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Raymund R Razonable; Randall T Hayden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.