Literature DB >> 10747120

A multisite trial comparing two cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia test kits, biotest CMV brite and Bartels/Argene CMV antigenemia.

K St George1, M J Boyd, S M Lipson, D Ferguson, G F Cartmell, L H Falk, C R Rinaldo, M L Landry.   

Abstract

A total of 513 blood specimens, predominantly from organ transplant recipients, human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients, and bone marrow transplant recipients, were tested for cytomegalovirus (CMV) by culture and pp65 antigenemia across four test sites. Peripheral blood leukocytes were examined by using both the Biotest CMV Brite and the Bartels/Argene CMV Antigenemia kits. A total of 109 specimens were positive for CMV, 106 (97%) were positive by antigenemia, and 34 (31%) were positive by culture. According to the manufacturers' instructions, 150,000 cells were applied per slide for the Biotest kit and 200,000 cells per slide for the Bartels kit. A total of 93 specimens (88%) were positive by the Biotest kit, and 86 (81%) were positive by the Bartels kit. In specimens found to be positive by only one kit, the positive cell counts were low (median, 1; range, 1 to 7). When the data from all four sites were combined and analyzed, there was no statistical difference between the performance of the two kits; the Biotest and Bartels kits were found to be equivalent in sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the detection of CMV pp65 antigenemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10747120      PMCID: PMC86458     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

1.  Effect of delayed specimen processing on cytomegalovirus antigenemia test results.

Authors:  M L Landry; D Ferguson; S Cohen; K Huber; P Wetherill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia-guided early treatment with ganciclovir versus ganciclovir at engraftment after allogeneic marrow transplantation: a randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  M Boeckh; T A Gooley; D Myerson; T Cunningham; G Schoch; R A Bowden
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Comparison of commercially available antibody reagents for the cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia assay.

Authors:  K St George; C R Rinaldo
Journal:  Clin Diagn Virol       Date:  1997-02

4.  High incidence of active cytomegalovirus infection among septic patients.

Authors:  A S Kutza; E Muhl; H Hackstein; H Kirchner; G Bein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Comparison of cytomegalovirus antigenemia and culture assays in patients on and off antiviral therapy.

Authors:  K St George; C R Rinaldo
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.327

6.  Application of a standardized cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay in the management of patients with AIDS.

Authors:  S M Lipson; M E Match; A I Toro; M H Kaplan; D H Shepp
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  Comparison of quantitative cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay with culture methods and correlation with clinical disease.

Authors:  M L Landry; D Ferguson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison between viremia and antigenemia for detection of cytomegalovirus in blood.

Authors:  W van der Bij; J Schirm; R Torensma; W J van Son; A M Tegzess; T H The
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Polymerase chain reaction monitoring reduces the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease and the duration and side effects of antiviral therapy after bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  H Einsele; G Ehninger; H Hebart; K M Wittkowski; U Schuler; G Jahn; P Mackes; M Herter; T Klingebiel; J Löffler; S Wagner; C A Müller
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Comparison of different immunostaining techniques and monoclonal antibodies to the lower matrix phosphoprotein (pp65) for optimal quantitation of human cytomegalovirus antigenemia.

Authors:  G Gerna; M G Revello; E Percivalle; F Morini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  5 in total

1.  Leukocyte concentration in the performance of the pp65 antigenemia assay.

Authors:  S M Lipson; P Della-Latta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Role of cell culture for virus detection in the age of technology.

Authors:  Diane S Leland; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Molecular targets for diagnostics and therapeutics of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV).

Authors:  Mavanur R Suresh; Pravin K Bhatnagar; Dipankar Das
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 2.327

4.  Sensitive and specific monoclonal antibody-based capture enzyme immunoassay for detection of nucleocapsid antigen in sera from patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Che; Li-Wen Qiu; Yu-Xian Pan; Kun Wen; Wei Hao; Li-Ya Zhang; Ya-Di Wang; Zhi-Yong Liao; Xu Hua; Vincent C C Cheng; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Diagnostic value of HCMV pp65 antigen detection by FCA for symptomatic and asymptomatic infection: compared to quantification of HCMV DNA and detection of IgM antibody in infants.

Authors:  Zhengrong Sun; Xiangshi Ceng; Zhiqin Mao; Jidong Wang; Qing Liu; Yaohua Ji; Yanping Ma; Ying Qi; Rong He; Qiang Ruan
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 3.402

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.