Literature DB >> 3726129

Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement methods.

W D Reinbold, H K Genant, U J Reiser, S T Harris, B Ettinger.   

Abstract

To investigate associations among methods for noninvasive measurement of skeletal bone mass, we studied 40 healthy early postmenopausal women and 68 older postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods included single- and dual-energy quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) of the lumbar spine, single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) of the distal third of the radius, and combined cortical thickness (CCT) of the second metacarpal shaft. Lateral thoracolumbar radiography was performed, and a spinal fracture index was calculated. There was good correlation between QCT and DPA methods in early postmenopausal women and modest correlation in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Correlations between spinal measurements (QCT or DPA) and appendicular cortical measurements (SPA or CCT) were modest in healthy women and poor in osteoporotic women. Measurements resulting from one method are not predictive of those by another method for the individual patient. The strongest correlation with severity of vertebral fracture is provided by QCT; the weakest, by SPA. There was a high correlation between single- and dual-energy QCT results, indicating that errors due to vertebral fat are not substantial in these postmenopausal women. Single-energy QCT may be adequate and perhaps preferable for assessing postmenopausal women. The measurement of spinal trabecular bone density by QCT discriminates between osteoporotic women and younger healthy women with more sensitivity than measurements of spinal integral bone by DPA or of appendicular cortical bone by SPA or CCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3726129     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.160.2.3726129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  34 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Bone marrow plays a role in bone metabolism: histomorphometry of iliac bone in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  T Hirano; K Iwasaki
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Normal bone density in Irish women: is American normative data suitable for use in Ireland?

Authors:  J Harbison; L Daly; B Murphy; C McCoy; J Masterson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Comparison between radial bone mineral density measured by single photon absorptiometry and histomorphometric bone mass parameters measured on iliac crest biopsies.

Authors:  F Duboeuf; D Uebelhart; G Boivin; C Edouard; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Bone densitometry of excised vertebrae; anatomical relationships.

Authors:  R B Mazess; P Pedersen; J Vetter; H S Barden
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: a comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  W Yu; C C Glüer; S Grampp; M Jergas; T Fuerst; C Y Wu; Y Lu; B Fan; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Noninvasive methods of bone-mass measurement.

Authors:  J P Sabatier; G Guaydier-Souquieres
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 8.  Advances in noninvasive bone measurement.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H Barden; J Vetter; M Ettinger
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Comparison of the radiographic vertebral trabecular pattern with the vertebral fracture prevalence and spinal bone density.

Authors:  C M Schnitzler; D G Pitchford; E M Willis; K A Gear
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  A population-based comparison of quantitative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine and hip.

Authors:  T L Holbrook; E Barrett-Connor; M Klauber; D Sartoris
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.