Literature DB >> 9184266

Vertebral and metacarpal morphometry as indicators of nutritional improvement.

M Revilla1, E Fraile, F Aguado, E R Hermandez, L F Villa, H Rico.   

Abstract

Because of the importance of nutrition in the development of bone mass, we studied the nutritional state, and bone state by means of metacarpal radiogrammetric measurements and vertebral morphometry in a group of 40 premenopausal women born between 1960 and 1970, mean age 29 +/- 5 years, and in another group of 40 postmenopausal women born between 1934 and 1944, mean age 55 +/- 4 years. Both groups were considered normal, the main characteristic distinguishing them being that the women born between 1934 and 1944 grew up in a period of widespread malnutrition in Spain and the women born between 1960 and 1970 grew up in a period of normal nutrition. Protein, carbohydrate and fat intake in these two periods differed significantly (p < 0.0001 in the three cases by Fischer's exact test). The values of the metacarpal measurements, anterior height of the dorsal vertebrae from T-4 to T-12, and posterior height from L-1 to L-4 between the premenopausal and postmenopausal groups of women were significantly different (p < 0.001) (Anova test). These findings show the importance of nutrition in the development of bone mass during childhood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9184266     DOI: 10.1007/BF02238964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  28 in total

1.  Dietary intake and biochemical indices of nutritional status in an elderly population, with estimates of the precision of the 7-d food record.

Authors:  H Payette; K Gray-Donald
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Comparison between metacarpal bone measurements by computarized radiogrammetry and total body DEXA in normal and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  H Rico; M Revilla; L F Villa; J F Martin-Santos; J L Cardenas; E Fraile
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Nutritional factors in osteoporosis.

Authors:  R P Heaney
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 11.848

4.  Pathogenesis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  D W Dempster; R Lindsay
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Serum levels of beta-2-microglobulin--a new marker of activity in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  L Descos; C André; S Beorghia; C Vincent; J P Revillard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Prediction of bone density from vitamin D receptor alleles.

Authors:  N A Morrison; J C Qi; A Tokita; P J Kelly; L Crofts; T V Nguyen; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Biochemical markers of nutrition in osteoporosis.

Authors:  H Rico; P Relea; M Revilla; E R Hernandez; I Arribas; L F Villa
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  Assessment of bone mineral content and bone mass by non-invasive radiologic methods.

Authors:  J Andresen; H E Nielsen
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec

Review 9.  Skeletal osteoporosis.

Authors:  C Christiansen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Hip fractures: a worldwide problem today and tomorrow.

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.