Literature DB >> 7692657

Effect of patient age on early detection of prostate cancer with serum prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination.

Jerome P Richie1, William J Catalona, Frederick R Ahmann, M'Liss A Hudson, Peter T Scardino, Robert C Flanigan, Jean B deKernion, Timothy L Ratliff, Louis R Kavoussi, Bruce L Dalkin, W Bedford Waters, Michael T MacFarlane, Paula C Southwick.   

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the effects of age by decade on the efficacy of digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for early detection of prostate cancer in men aged fifty and over. A prospective multicenter clinical trial was conducted at six university centers. All 6,630 male volunteers underwent a serum PSA (Hybritech, Tandem) determination and DRE. Quadrant biopsies of the prostate were performed if PSA was > 4 ng/mL or DRE suspicious. A total of 1,167 biopsies were performed, and 264 cancers were detected. The cancer detection rate increased from 3 percent in men aged fifty to fifty-nine to 14 percent in men eighty years or older (p < 0.0001). PSA detected significantly more of the total cancers than DRE at all age ranges (p < 0.05). The positive predictive values (PPV) for PSA were 32 percent (50-59 years), 30 percent (60-69 years), 34 percent (70-79 years), and 38 percent (80+ years). The corresponding PPVs for DRE were 17 percent, 21 percent, 25 percent, and 38 percent. Eighteen percent of the cancers were detected solely by DRE, whereas 45 percent of cancers were detected solely by PSA. Thus, the use of both tests in combination provided the highest rate of detection in all age groups. One hundred-sixty patients underwent radical prostatectomy and pathologic staging. Cancer was organ-confined in 74 percent (25/34) of men aged fifty to fifty-nine, 76 percent (65/86) of men aged sixty to sixty-nine, and 60 percent (24/40) of men aged seventy or over (chi 2, < 70 vs. > or = 70, p < 0.05). Early detection programs yield a lower, yet still substantial, cancer detection rate in younger men, and there is a greater likelihood for detection of organ-confined disease in this age range. Younger men have the longest projected life expectancy and, therefore, the most to gain from early prostate cancer detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7692657     DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90359-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  24 in total

1.  Optimizing prostate biopsy strategies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

2.  Utility of volume adjusted prostate specific antigen density in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in Arab men.

Authors:  M Sheikh; O Al-Saeed; E O Kehinde; T Sinan; J T Anim; Y Ali
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Age-specific PSA reference ranges in a group of non-urologic patients.

Authors:  A C Atalay; M I Karaman; S Güney; A Dalkiliç; A Y Müslümanoğlu; E Ergenekon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Prostate cancer.

Authors:  D Mazhar; J Waxman
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Cancer Progress and Priorities: Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Kevin H Kensler; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Prostate Cancer Disparities by Race and Ethnicity: From Nucleotide to Neighborhood.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 6.915

7.  Argument for prostate cancer screening in populations of African-Caribbean origin.

Authors:  Alan L Patrick; Clareann H Bunker; Joel B Nelson; Rajiv Dhir; Victor W Wheeler; Joseph M Zmuda; Jean-Robert Richard; Andrew C Belle; Lewis H Kuller
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Image-based clinical decision support for transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of multiple logistic regression, artificial neural network, and support vector machine.

Authors:  Hak Jong Lee; Sung Il Hwang; Seok-Min Han; Seong Ho Park; Seung Hyup Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Chang Gyu Seong; Gheeyoung Choe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Risk stratification in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  High prevalence of screen detected prostate cancer in West Africans: implications for racial disparity of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ann W Hsing; Edward Yeboah; Richard Biritwum; Yao Tettey; Angelo M De Marzo; Andrew Adjei; George J Netto; Kai Yu; Yan Li; Anand P Chokkalingam; Lisa W Chu; David Chia; Alan Partin; Ian M Thompson; Sabah M Quraishi; Shelley Niwa; Robert Tarone; Robert N Hoover
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.