Literature DB >> 16362587

Utility of volume adjusted prostate specific antigen density in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in Arab men.

M Sheikh1, O Al-Saeed, E O Kehinde, T Sinan, J T Anim, Y Ali.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to assess the utility of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (PSAD) in discriminating between benign and malignant prostate disease in the Kuwaiti Arab population.
METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients suspected of having prostate cancer because of serum PSA > 4 ng/ml, or detection of a prostatic nodule on rectal examination were further investigated by determination of PSAD, TRUS of prostate, sexant prostatic biopsy and histological analysis to establish the correct diagnosis. Other diagnostic measures included the determination of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS: Of the 100 prostate biopsies that were performed, 33 cases were confirmed to be prostate cancer and 67 were described as benign lesions comprising benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with or without prostatitis. The age range for patients with prostate cancer was 42-90 years, and 52-90 years for those without prostate cancer. The mean prostate volume was 58.82 cc (range 9-177 cc) and 62.60 cc (range 15-140 cc), the mean PSA value was 36.65 ng/ml (range 5.8-200 ng/ml) and 16.49 ng/ml (range 1.4-46.0 ng/ml), while the mean PSAD was 0.92 (range 0.046-5.714) and 0.452 (range 0.034-2.294) for patients with prostate cancer and patients without prostate cancer respectively. Patients with PSA less than 4 ng/ml (3 cases) all had benign prostate lesions, and 7 cases with PSA more than 50 ng/ml all had prostate cancer and were excluded because values above 50 ng/ml have close to 100% specificity for prostate cancer. Further analysis was done on the remaining 90 cases which were patients with a PSA between 4 and 50 ng/ml. The discriminating power of serum PSA for detecting prostate cancer as estimated by the area under ROC was 0.686 while that for PSAD was 0.732. The maximum likelihood for a positive PSA was at a PSAD cut-off point of 0.32. For the PSA cut-off point of l0 ng/ml, the sensitivity was 80%, and specificity was 42.2%. For the PSAD cut-off point of 0.32, the sensitivity was 58% and the specificity 76.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: Determination of PSAD is not a useful adjunct to serum PSA values in the range of 10-50 ng/ ml in our population. PSAD value less than 0.32 with PSA less than l0 ng/ml strongly suggests benign disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16362587     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-005-4683-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  33 in total

1.  Elevated prostate-specific antigen level and the negative prostate biopsy.

Authors:  J J Berman; G W Moore; E L Alonsozana; G F Mamo
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 0.954

2.  Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  T A Stamey; N Yang; A R Hay; J E McNeal; F S Freiha; E Redwine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Serum prostate-specific antigen: its use in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  P H Lange; M K Brawer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen as a marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  M Barak; Y Mecz; A Lurie; N Gruener
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1989-05

5.  Detection of prostate carcinoma using prostate specific antigen, its density, and the density of the transition zone in Japanese men with intermediate serum prostate specific antigen concentrations.

Authors:  K Gohji; M Nomi; S Egawa; K Morisue; A Takenaka; M Okamoto; M Ohori; A Fujii
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The role of prostate-specific antigen as part of the diagnostic triad and as a guide when to perform a biopsy.

Authors:  R J Babaian; J L Camps
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Age-specific reference ranges for serum prostate-specific antigen in black men.

Authors:  T O Morgan; S J Jacobsen; W F McCarthy; D J Jacobson; D G McLeod; J W Moul
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prostate specific antigen density: a means of distinguishing benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer.

Authors:  M C Benson; I S Whang; A Pantuck; K Ring; S A Kaplan; C A Olsson; W H Cooner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy Japanese men: lower values than for similarly aged white men.

Authors:  J E Oesterling; Y Kumamoto; T Tsukamoto; C J Girman; H A Guess; N Masumori; S J Jacobsen; M M Lieber
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1995-03

10.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  9 in total

1.  Utility of the transition zone index for identification of prostate cancer in Chinese men with intermediate PSA levels.

Authors:  Ting-yue Qi; Ya-qing Chen; Jun Jiang; Yun-kai Zhu; Xiao-hong Yao; Xiao-jin Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Antibacterial therapy improves the effectiveness of prostate cancer detection using prostate-specific antigen in patients with asymptomatic prostatitis.

Authors:  Ping Tang; Ke-Ji Xie; Bin Wang; Xiang-Rong Deng; Ru-Biao Ou
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Evaluation of prostate cancer prevalence in Iranian male population with increased PSA level, a one center experience.

Authors:  Mohammad Kazem Moslemi; Fariborz Lotfi; Seyed Ali Tahvildar
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Pattern of prostate cancer presentation among the Egyptian population: A study in a single tertiary care center.

Authors:  Ahmed Elabbady; Ahmed Eid; Ahmed Fahmy; Ahmed Fouad Kotb
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-12-05

5.  Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men.

Authors:  Mehraj Sheikh; Tariq Sinan; Elijah O Kehinde; Ali Yt Hussein; Jehoram T Anim; Adel A Al-Hunayan
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.526

6.  Prostate cancer in the Arab population. An overview.

Authors:  Osman Z Al-Abdin; Ibrahim Z Al-Beeshi
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  High rates of advanced prostate cancer in the Middle East: Analysis from a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Marilyne Daher; Talar Telvizian; Christelle Dagher; Zahi Abdul-Sater; Sarah Abdel Massih; Alissar El Chediak; Maya Charafeddine; Mohammed Shahait; Raafat Alameddine; Sally Temraz; Fady Geara; Bassem Youssef; Albert El Hajj; Rami Nasr; Wassim Wazzan; Muhammad Bulbul; Raja Khauli; Ali Shamseddine; Deborah Mukherji
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2021-06-23

8.  Preventing Unnecessary Invasive Cancer-Diagnostic Tests: Changing the Cut-off Points.

Authors:  G Pourmand; R Ramezani; B Sabahgoulian; F Nadali; Ar Mehrsai; Mr Nikoobakht; F Allameh; Sh Hossieni; A Seraji; M Rezai; F Haidari; S Dehghani; R Razmandeh; B Pourmand
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 1.429

9.  Prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density cutoff points among Indonesian population suspected for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ahmad Anies Shahab; Doddy M Soebadi; Wahjoe Djatisoesanto; Sunaryo Hardjowijoto; Soetojo Soetojo; Lukman Hakim
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2013-01-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.