Literature DB >> 16893002

Relevant distractors do not cause negative priming.

Christian Frings1.   

Abstract

Highly relevant stimuli (such as one's own name) can capture attention in situations in which one can only partially attend to the environment (e.g., the classic "cocktail party" phenomenon, introduced by Moray, 1959). The present study extends previous findings on selection tasks demonstrating these intrusions of relevant stimuli. Not only can highly relevant stimuli be detected more easily, but attempts to deliberately ignore them will also be hampered, so subsequent reactions to such stimuli will not be slowed. In the experiment, participants (N = 32) ignored the first names of other participants without problems, and they showed slowed reactions to such names that they had ignored shortly before (negative priming task). In contrast, no slowing was observed for participants' own names when those names had just previously been used as distractors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16893002     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval.

Authors:  W T Neill; L A Valdes; K M Terry; D S Gorfein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast and slow components.

Authors:  Frank P McKenna; Dinkar Sharma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information.

Authors:  F Pratto; O P John
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1991-09

4.  Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review.

Authors:  E Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

5.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953).

Authors:  N L Wood; N Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1995-09

Review 6.  Determinants of negative priming.

Authors:  C P May; M J Kane; L Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.

Authors:  B Milliken; S Joordens; P M Merikle; A E Seiffert
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: how frequent are attention shifts to one's name in an irrelevant auditory channel?

Authors:  N Wood; N Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects.

Authors:  S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-11

10.  Processing of unattended visual information.

Authors:  G Wolford; F Morrison
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Negative priming is diminished under high blood pressure in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Gregor Domes
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Threat processing in obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence from a modified negative priming task.

Authors:  Nader Amir; Michelle Cobb; Amanda S Morrison
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2008-03-06

3.  Creating a network of importance: The particular effects of self-relevance on stimulus processing.

Authors:  Sarah Schäfer; Dirk Wentura; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.