Literature DB >> 23220013

Dose intensification of busulfan in the preparative regimen is associated with improved survival: a phase I/II controlled, randomized study.

Simrit Parmar1, Gabriela Rondon, Marcos de Lima, Peter Thall, Ronald Bassett, Paolo Anderlini, Partow Kebriaei, Issa Khouri, Prasanth Ganesan, Richard Champlin, Sergio Giralt.   

Abstract

Dose intensity is important for disease control in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We conducted a phase I/II controlled, adoptive, randomized study to determine the optimal dosing schedule of i.v. busulfan. Patients aged ≤75 years with advanced hematologic malignancies with human leukocyte antigen-compatible donor were eligible. All patients received fludarabine at 30 mg/m(2)/d for 4 days, and busulfan was administered in different doses in oral or i.v. formulations. As determined by the phase I trial, i.v. busulfan at a dose of 11.2 mg/kg/d was used for the phase II expansion cohort. Altogether, 80 patients with a median age of 56 years were enrolled. Forty percent had active disease at the time of transplantation. Engraftment occurred in 91%, and a complete response was achieved in 79% of patients posttransplantation. At a median follow-up of 91 months in the surviving patients, the outcomes for i.v. busulfan dose of 11.2 mg/kg/d versus other doses were as follows: nonrelapse mortality, 34% versus 23% (P = .4); cumulative incidence of relapse, 43% versus 68% (P = .02); relapse-free survival, 25% versus 9% (P = .017); and overall survival, 27% versus 9% (P = .02). We conclude that optimizing i.v. busulfan dose intensity in the preparative regimen may overcome disease-associated poor prognostic factors.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23220013      PMCID: PMC4052712          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  28 in total

1.  Comparative outcome of nonmyeloablative and myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients older than 50 years of age.

Authors:  Edwin P Alyea; Haesook T Kim; Vincent Ho; Corey Cutler; John Gribben; Daniel J DeAngelo; Stephanie J Lee; Sarah Windawi; Jerome Ritz; Richard M Stone; Joseph H Antin; Robert J Soiffer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Outcome after reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic SCT for AML in first complete remission: comparison of two regimens.

Authors:  X Cahu; M Mohty; C Faucher; P Chevalier; N Vey; J El-Cheikh; T Guillaume; S Furst; J Delaunay; S Ayari; P Moreau; J A Gastaut; J L Harousseau; D Blaise
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in AML and MDS using myeloablative versus reduced-intensity conditioning: the role of dose intensity.

Authors:  A Shimoni; I Hardan; N Shem-Tov; M Yeshurun; R Yerushalmi; A Avigdor; I Ben-Bassat; A Nagler
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Maintenance therapy with low-dose azacitidine after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for recurrent acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: a dose and schedule finding study.

Authors:  Marcos de Lima; Sergio Giralt; Peter F Thall; Leandro de Padua Silva; Roy B Jones; Krishna Komanduri; Thomas M Braun; Hoang Q Nguyen; Richard Champlin; Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT.

Authors:  Mohamed L Sorror; Michael B Maris; Rainer Storb; Frederic Baron; Brenda M Sandmaier; David G Maloney; Barry Storer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Comparative outcome of reduced intensity and myeloablative conditioning regimen in HLA identical sibling allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients older than 50 years of age with acute myeloblastic leukaemia: a retrospective survey from the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).

Authors:  M Aoudjhane; M Labopin; N C Gorin; A Shimoni; T Ruutu; H-J Kolb; F Frassoni; J M Boiron; J L Yin; J Finke; H Shouten; D Blaise; M Falda; A A Fauser; J Esteve; E Polge; S Slavin; D Niederwieser; A Nagler; V Rocha
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Ablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults 60 years of age and older.

Authors:  Herschel Wallen; Theodore A Gooley; H Joachim Deeg; John M Pagel; Oliver W Press; Frederick R Appelbaum; Rainer Storb; Ajay K Gopal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Retrospective comparison of reduced-intensity conditioning and conventional high-dose conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using HLA-identical sibling donors in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Rodrigo Martino; Simona Iacobelli; Ronald Brand; Thekla Jansen; Anja van Biezen; Jürgen Finke; Andrea Bacigalupo; Dietrich Beelen; Jossy Reiffers; Agnes Devergie; Emilie Alessandrino; Ghulam J Mufti; Renée Barge; Jorge Sierra; Tapani Ruutu; Marc Boogaerts; Michele Falda; Jean-Pierre Jouet; Dieter Niederwieser; Theo de Witte
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Low-dose azacitidine after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia.

Authors:  Elias Jabbour; Sergio Giralt; Hagop Kantarjian; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Madan Jagasia; Partow Kebriaei; Leandro de Padua; Elizabeth J Shpall; Richard Champlin; Marcos de Lima
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Reduced intensity conditioning compared with myeloablative conditioning using unrelated donor transplants in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Olle Ringdén; Myriam Labopin; Gerhard Ehninger; Dietger Niederwieser; Richard Olsson; Nadezda Basara; Juergen Finke; Rainer Schwerdtfeger; Matthias Eder; Donald Bunjes; Norbert-Claude Gorin; Mohamad Mohty; Vanderson Rocha
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

1.  Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for children with acute myeloid leukemia-results of the AML SCT-BFM 2007 trial.

Authors:  Martin G Sauer; Peter J Lang; Michael H Albert; Peter Bader; Ursula Creutzig; Matthias Eyrich; Johann Greil; Bernd Gruhn; Wolfgang Holter; Thomas Klingebiel; Bernhard Kremens; Heiko von der Leyen; Christine Mauz-Körholz; Roland Meisel; Kirsten Mischke; Ingo Müller; Charlotte M Niemeyer; Christina Peters; Christine Pohler; Dirk Reinhardt; Birgit Burkhardt; Paul G Schlegel; Ansgar S Schulz; Johanna Schrum; Petr Sedlacek; Brigitte Strahm; Wilhelm Woessmann; Rupert Handgretinger; Martin Zimmermann; Arndt Borkhardt
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Economic and clinical aspects of intravenous versus oral busulfan in adult patients for conditioning prior to HSCT.

Authors:  Karin Berger; Dorothee Schopohl; Christina Rieger; Helmut Ostermann
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.603

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.