PURPOSE: Resistance to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis represents a major obstacle to cancer control. Overexpression of Bcl-2 is seen in multiple tumor types and targeting Bcl-2 may provide therapeutic benefit. A phase I study of navitoclax, a novel inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins, was conducted to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled to intermittent dosing cohorts received navitoclax on day -3, followed by dosing on days 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. Patients on continuous dosing received a 1-week lead-in dose of 150 mg followed by continuous daily administration. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses, biomarker analyses, and platelet monitoring. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients, including 29 with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) or pulmonary carcinoid, were enrolled between 2007 and 2008, 35 on intermittent and 12 on continuous dosing cohorts. Primary toxicities included diarrhea (40%), nausea (34%), vomiting (36%), and fatigue (34%); most were grade 1 or 2. Dose- and schedule-dependent thrombocytopenia was seen in all patients. One patient with SCLC had a confirmed partial response lasting longer than 2 years, and eight patients with SCLC or carcinoid had stable disease (one remained on study for 13 months). Pro-gastrin releasing peptide (pro-GRP) was identified as a surrogate marker of Bcl-2 amplification and changes correlated with changes in tumor volume. CONCLUSION: Navitoclax is safe and well tolerated, with dose-dependent thrombocytopenia as the major adverse effect. Preliminary efficacy data are encouraging in SCLC. Efficacy in SCLC and the utility of pro-GRP as a marker of treatment response will be further evaluated in phase II studies.
PURPOSE: Resistance to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis represents a major obstacle to cancer control. Overexpression of Bcl-2 is seen in multiple tumor types and targeting Bcl-2 may provide therapeutic benefit. A phase I study of navitoclax, a novel inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins, was conducted to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled to intermittent dosing cohorts received navitoclax on day -3, followed by dosing on days 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. Patients on continuous dosing received a 1-week lead-in dose of 150 mg followed by continuous daily administration. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses, biomarker analyses, and platelet monitoring. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients, including 29 with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) or pulmonary carcinoid, were enrolled between 2007 and 2008, 35 on intermittent and 12 on continuous dosing cohorts. Primary toxicities included diarrhea (40%), nausea (34%), vomiting (36%), and fatigue (34%); most were grade 1 or 2. Dose- and schedule-dependent thrombocytopenia was seen in all patients. One patient with SCLC had a confirmed partial response lasting longer than 2 years, and eight patients with SCLC or carcinoid had stable disease (one remained on study for 13 months). Pro-gastrin releasing peptide (pro-GRP) was identified as a surrogate marker of Bcl-2 amplification and changes correlated with changes in tumor volume. CONCLUSION:Navitoclax is safe and well tolerated, with dose-dependent thrombocytopenia as the major adverse effect. Preliminary efficacy data are encouraging in SCLC. Efficacy in SCLC and the utility of pro-GRP as a marker of treatment response will be further evaluated in phase II studies.
Authors: Stephen K Tahir; Xiufen Yang; Mark G Anderson; Susan E Morgan-Lappe; Aparna V Sarthy; Jun Chen; Robert B Warner; Shi-Chung Ng; Stephen W Fesik; Steve W Elmore; Saul H Rosenberg; Christin Tse Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Christin Tse; Alexander R Shoemaker; Jessica Adickes; Mark G Anderson; Jun Chen; Sha Jin; Eric F Johnson; Kennan C Marsh; Michael J Mitten; Paul Nimmer; Lisa Roberts; Stephen K Tahir; Yu Xiao; Xiufen Yang; Haichao Zhang; Stephen Fesik; Saul H Rosenberg; Steven W Elmore Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Christine L Hann; Vincent C Daniel; Elizabeth A Sugar; Irina Dobromilskaya; Sara C Murphy; Leslie Cope; Xue Lin; Jared S Hierman; Daniel L Wilburn; D Neil Watkins; Charles M Rudin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: T Ohmori; E R Podack; K Nishio; M Takahashi; Y Miyahara; Y Takeda; N Kubota; Y Funayama; H Ogasawara; T Ohira Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1993-04-15 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: J Cummings; M Ranson; E Lacasse; J R Ganganagari; M St-Jean; G Jayson; J Durkin; C Dive Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2006-07-03 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Hua Fang; Theresa M Harned; Ondrej Kalous; Vanessa Maldonado; Yves A DeClerck; C Patrick Reynolds Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sarah A Wieczorek; Frank Breitenbuecher; Aashish Soni; Katja Paul-Konietzko; Sophie Ziegler; Ali Sak; George Iliakis; Martin Schuler Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 4.553