Literature DB >> 7664429

Valvular and systemic arterial hemodynamics in aortic valve stenosis. A model-based approach.

W K Laskey1, W G Kussmaul, A Noordergraaf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the severity of a stenotic aortic valve has been confounded by reports of flow dependence of stenosis severity. We hypothesized that the pressure gradient at the stenotic aortic valve would be dependent on the characteristics of the arterial circulation. Therefore, clinically useful measures of the severity of aortic valve stenosis may have to take this dependence into account. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We developed an analog model of the systemic arterial circulation in the presence of a stenotic aortic valve. The model clearly describes the dependence of stenosis severity (described by coefficients A and B) on the resistive and capacitive properties of the arterial system. We used high-fidelity pressure recordings obtained at the time of diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and found that a highly significant relation between the measured mean transvalvular gradient and that predicted by the model was demonstrated both at rest (r2 = .90) and with exercise (r2 = .80). Furthermore, the relative constancy of stenosis coefficients A and B was validated.
CONCLUSIONS: Transvalvular hemodynamics in patients with aortic valve stenosis are dependent on the properties of the arterial system. The current model describes such behavior, correctly predicts the transvalvular gradient from model parameters, and may be useful in the assessment of stenosis severity under various clinical and physiological conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7664429     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.6.1473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: check the valve but don't forget the arteries!

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Jean G Dumesnil
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  L Kadem; J G Dumesnil; R Rieu; L-G Durand; D Garcia; P Pibarot
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Dynamic changes in aortic impedance after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and its impact on exploratory outcome.

Authors:  Yukari Kobayashi; Juyong B Kim; Kegan J Moneghetti; Yuhei Kobayashi; Ran Zhang; Daniel A Brenner; Ryan O'Malley; Ingela Schnittger; Michael Fischbein; D Craig Miller; Alan C Yeung; David Liang; Francois Haddad; William F Fearon
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: importance of pressure recovery.

Authors:  R S Heinrich; A A Fontaine; R Y Grimes; A Sidhaye; S Yang; K E Moore; R A Levine; A P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertensive patients with aortic valve stenosis: a drug withdrawal study.

Authors:  J Jiménez-Candil; J Bermejo; R Yotti; C Cortina; M Moreno; J L Cantalapiedra; M A García-Fernández
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Stephen H Little; Kwan-Leung Chan; Ian G Burwash
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Arterial Wave Reflection and Aortic Valve Stenosis: Diagnostic Challenges and Prognostic Significance.

Authors:  Stamatia Pagoulatou; Dionysios Adamopoulos; Georgios Rovas; Vasiliki Bikia; Hajo Müller; Georgios Giannakopoulos; Sarah Mauler-Wittwer; Marc-Joseph Licker; Nikolaos Stergiopulos; Stéphane Noble
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-08

8.  Uncertainty in model-based treatment decision support: Applied to aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Roel Meiburg; Wouter Huberts; Marcel C M Rutten; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.747

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.